Is the PASCAL Device Effective against MitraClip?

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most common valvulopathy and full medical treatment at maximal tolerated doses has been shown quite effective to treat it. However, its limited in a group of patients that require valve intervention. 

¿Es efectivo el dispositivo PASCAL comparado con MitraClip?

At present, the ideal treatment is surgical valve replacement, which is in many cases is not viable because of its high surgical risk. It is in this scenario where Edge-to-edge with MitraClip has been shown beneficial. 

Currently, there is another device available, the PASCAL, but its safety and efficacy has not been yet analyzed against the MitraClip. 

The CLASP IID is a randomized, multicenter, multinational, prospective study assessing the safety and efficacy of the PASCAL against MitraClip in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with prohibitive risk of surgery. 

Safety end point was the composite of MAE at 30 days (cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, need for dialysis, major bleeding and surgical or percutaneous non-elective reintervention of the mitral valve) and effective end point was the presence of MI ≤2 + at 6 months.

It included 180 patients, 117 receiving PASCAL and 63 MitraClip.

Read also: Combined Calcified Lesion Preparation Strategy.

Mean age was 81, 66% were men, 85% had hypertension, 18% diabetes, and 58% atrial fibrillation.

75% of mitral regurgitation was grade 4+, effective orifice area was 0.50 cm2, ejection fraction 58%, diastolic volume 145, pulmonary artery systolic pressure 43 mmHg, TAPSE 20, atrial volume 120 ml and severe tricuspid failure 3%.

Primary safety end point at 30 days was similar (3.4% for PASCAL vs. 4.8% for MitraClip), showing non-inferiority between devices. There was no difference in mortality, stroke, MI, need for dialysis, major bleeding and non-elective mitral valve intervention. 

Read also: Is Clopidogrel Monotherapy Safe After a Month of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients?

Efficacy end point at 6 months also resulted similar, meeting non-inferiority criteria (96.5% for PASCAL vs. 96.8% for MitraClip).

Conclusion

the CLASP IID showed PASCAL system met non-inferiority primary end points expanding percutaneous treatment as a valid option for patients with symptomatic degenerative mitral valve regurgitation at prohibitive surgical risk.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation in Prohibitive Surgical Risk Patients.

Reference: D. Scott Lim, M. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:2523–2536.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....