Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Stages of Heart Failure and Prognostic Implications after Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

We are already familiar with the strong impact of secondary mitral valve regurgitation (SMR) in survival and quality of life.

Insuficiencia mitral secundaria: Clasificación según daño cardiaco y su implicancia pronóstica luego de la reparación de la válvula mitral borde a borde

 Most of these patients present heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Stages of heart failure based on extra-mitral cardiac involvement has been shown relevant. There is also extensive research on aortic valve disease and data on medically treated HFrEF-SMR patients divided into stages. 

Patients with left ventricular dilation or left atrial enlargement have shown around 85% survival rate at 3 years, while this reduces to 75% with tricuspid regurgitation or pulmonary hypertension. Finally, patients with right ventricular dysfunction present the worse prognosis, with 60% survival rate at 3 years, approximately.  

The aim of this retrospective study was to apply the HR stages above mentioned to patients undergoing transcatheter Edge-to-edge (M-TEER), and assess the prognostic implications of these classification in terms of survival and symptoms. 

Primary end point was all cause mortality, and symptoms expressed as functional class according to NYHA at 2 years. Patients were classified into 4 stages: stage 1 (LV end diastolic volume ≥ 159 ml or EF < 50%), stage 2 (history of atrial fibrillation or indexed left atrial volume > 34 ml/m2), stage 3 (tricuspid regurgitation ≥ 3 and/or PSAP >65 mmHg), stage 4 (biventricular dysfunction.  

Read also: Is There Any Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Transient and Persistent Acute Kidney Injury in ACS Patients after Invasive Treatment?

Of 1354 patients set to be analyzed, only 849 met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 72 and there were more men, mostly in stage 2 (46% of patients), followed by stage IV (29%), stage III (15%) and stage I (10%).

Survival rate at 2 years was significantly different between stages (stage I: 78.1%, stage II: 71.9%, stage III: 62.9%, stage IV: 48.9%; P< 0.01). On the other hand, HR symptoms tended to increase as stages increased, though differences were not statistically significant. 

Finally, at multivariable analysis, kidney function, diabetes mellitus, age, NYHA functional class IV, post M-TEER MR ≥3+, and stage increase resulted predictors of all-cause mortality at 2 years.

Conclusion 

M-TEER patients classified into HFrEF-SMR stages according to extra-mitral cardiac involvement should be taken into account by the heart team for decision making on therapeutic strategy. Stage classification is easy to implement and is associated to significant differences in symptoms and survival after M-TEER. In addition, this could be useful to identify patients that will benefit from early intervention.   

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Staging Heart Failure Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Reference: Lukas Stolz, MD et al J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...

TAVR in Young Low-Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has established itself as an effective strategy for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis across different risk groups. While previous...

TAVR and Atrial Fibrillation: What Anticoagulants Should We Use?

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in TAVR patients ranges from 15 to 30%, depending on series. This arrhythmia has been associated to higher...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...