ESC 2023 | Anticoagulation After Primary PCI in STEMI Patients

The empirical prescription of anticoagulants after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), also know as post-procedural anticoagulation (PPA), is nowadays a common practice that uses various types of medications. Despite studies like HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX, in which 41% of patients received PPA, and the CCC-ACS registry, where 75% of subjects received PPA after primary PCI, European and American guidelines do not provide recommendations regarding PPA in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing the aforementioned procedure.

ESC 2023 | Anticoagulación luego de ATC primaria en pacientes con IAMCEST

The purpose of this randomized, multicenter study was to demonstrate the superiority of PPA (using unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or bivalirudin) compared with a placebo in preventing ischemic events during the 30 days following randomization.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, stent thrombosis, or urgent revascularization at 30 days. The secondary endpoint (SEP) was BARC 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days.

In total, 2989 patients were randomized, with 1494 assigned to the PPA group and 1495 to the placebo group. The average age was 60 years, and most patients were men. Transradial access was the most frequent access method. The most frequently affected artery was the left anterior descending artery, followed by the right coronary artery. Approximately 65% of patients had multi-vessel disease.

Read also: ESC 2023 | OCTOBER TRIAL: Should We Begin to Consider OCT for Bifurcation Lesions?

Regarding the PEP, there were no significant differences between the PPA group and the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63-1.57; P = 0.988). There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the SEP (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.30-1.83; P = 0.511).

Conclusion 

Routine use of PPA after primary PCI is safe but did not demonstrate an improvement in ischemic events at 30 days. Results from this study suggest that there are no significant differences between anticoagulant agents in preventing ischemic events, although additional studies are needed to confirm this result.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Post-procedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial.

Reference: Shaoping Nie, M.D., Ph.D., FESC, FACC, FSCAI et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....