BIFURCAT Registry: Long Term Diabetes Impact on Bifurcations PCI Outcomes

The impact of diabetes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are well known, and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), outcomes tend to be less favorable, with higher restenosis rate, repeat myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis. Despite the development of drug eluting stents, procedures and techniques, treating bifurcation lesions in diabetic patients still show unfavorable outcomes and lower success rate vs. less complex coronary lesions. 

Diabetes y enfermedad vascular periférica: viejas drogas con nueva evidencia

The aim of this retrospective observational study based on real world data was to assess the impact of diabetes in bifurcation PCI using second generation stents. Also, researchers sought to identify adverse event predictors in diabetic patients at followup. 

Primary end point was defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all cause death, acute MI or the need for new target lesion revascularization. (TLR).

The analysis looked at 5537 patients; 33% were diabetic. Diabetic patients were on average older and presented higher prevalence of kidney disease (p < 0.001), hypertension (p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (p < 0.001), prior MI (p = 0.02), prior PCI (p < 0.001) and prior CABG (p = 0.006). From an angiographic perspective, this group of patients had a higher incidence of diffuse CAD (p < 0.001) and severe calcification (p < 0.001), though there were no significant differences as regards left main compromise and Medina classification. 

Read also: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Long Term Survival with Alcohol Septal Ablation according to Hemodynamic Variables.

At 21 months, there was a significantly higher MACE rate in diabetic patients, vs non-diabetic (17% vs. 9%, p < 0.001). This finding also reflected in all cause death incidence (9% vs. 4%, p < 0.001), TLR (5% vs. 3%, p = 0.001), MI (4% vs. 2%, p < 0.001) and stent thrombosis (2% vs. 1%, p = 0.007). 

As regards MACE predictors, chronic kidney disease (HR: 2.99; CI: 2.21–4.04, p < 0.001), baseline ejection fraction (HR: 0.98; CI: 0.97–0.99, p = 0.04), transfemoral approach (HR: 1.62; CI: 1.23–2.15, p = 0.001), and left main compromise (HR: 1.44; CI: 1.06–1.94, p = 0.02), main branch diameter (HR: 0.79; CI: 0.66–0.94, p = 0.01) and the use of final kissing balloon (HR: 0.70; CI: 0.52–0.93, p = 0.01) resulted independent predictors of MACE at followup. 

Conclusion 

Diabetic patients undergoing bifurcation PCI with second generation drug eluting stents presented higher MACE, all cause death, TLR and stent thrombosis incidence vs non-diabetic patients. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Impact of diabetes on long‐term outcomes of bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention. An analysis from the BIFURCAT registry.

Reference: Francesco Bruno MD et al Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;1–11. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...