Preparation Before Elective Coronary Angiography: Is Prolonged Fasting the Only Option?

When scheduling a coronary angiography, patients are usually instructed to fast for at least 8 hours (no oral intake after dinner). However, this strategy can lead to negative effects such as discomfort, irritability, dehydration, and even hypoglycemia in some cases. Previous studies have not shown significant differences in gastric complications between patients fasting only 2 hours before the procedure and those fasting for more than 6 hours, with a 0.02% risk of aspiration for subjects undergoing elective procedures and 0.01% for those undergoing emergency procedures.

Dieta proinflamatoria y su potencial para desencadenar eventos cardiovasculares

Several associations, including the American Society of Anesthesiology, recommend fasting for at least 2 hours for liquids and 6 hours for solids before a procedure. A retrospective study involving a considerable number of patients (n=1916) over three years of enrollment showed no patients requiring emergency intubation or developing aspiration pneumonia after the procedure.

Given the scarce data prior to an invasive coronary study, Woods et al. conducted this work with the aim of assessing the need for fasting for conscious sedation before elective coronary procedures.

The study was prospective, randomized, and conducted at a single center in the United States. The primary objective was to compare the safety of a healthy, slightly acidic diet (low-fat, low-cholesterol, and low-sodium foods) before coronary angiography versus following the standard fasting guidelines. The secondary objective was to evaluate patient satisfaction and comfort.

Read also: Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Concomitant Transcatheter Intervention: Can We?

The study included patients from the cardiac critical care unit, scheduled for cardiac catheterization with conscious sedation and analgesia. Patients with gastric emptying disorders such as chronic nausea, significant hiatal hernia, and enteral feeding, and subjects requiring emergency catheterization were excluded.

The study sample included 197 patients (100 with a healthy diet until the time of catheterization and 97 who fasted for at least 6 hours for solids), with an average age of 62.7 years and male predominance (62.4%). Only diagnostic studies were performed in most cases (57.4%), with angina (70.6%), SCASEST (13.2%), or unstable angina (6.1%) being the main reasons for the invasive study.

Read also: Should We Treat Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in TAVI?

The satisfaction score reported by patients was significantly higher in the healthy diet group (1.3 vs 3.1; p<0.001). Additionally, those subjects experienced lower thirst and hunger levels both before and after catheterization (thirst: 29.2% vs 48.7%, p<0.001; hunger: 22.6% vs 64.7%; p<0.001). No patient experienced aspiration pneumonia, intubation, or hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that in a selected population (without emergency catheterization), a healthy diet before the intervention—without the need for prolonged fasting—is safe. This approach represents an advancement in proper preparation and patient satisfaction, both regarding sedation and the elective coronary procedure.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Fasting Versus a Heart-Healthy Diet Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Carri Woods, Michelle Wood, Angela Boylan, Mindy E. Flanagan, Jan Powers; Fasting Versus a Heart-Healthy Diet Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Crit Care 1 January 2024; 33 (1): 29–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024115.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...