Preparation Before Elective Coronary Angiography: Is Prolonged Fasting the Only Option?

When scheduling a coronary angiography, patients are usually instructed to fast for at least 8 hours (no oral intake after dinner). However, this strategy can lead to negative effects such as discomfort, irritability, dehydration, and even hypoglycemia in some cases. Previous studies have not shown significant differences in gastric complications between patients fasting only 2 hours before the procedure and those fasting for more than 6 hours, with a 0.02% risk of aspiration for subjects undergoing elective procedures and 0.01% for those undergoing emergency procedures.

Dieta proinflamatoria y su potencial para desencadenar eventos cardiovasculares

Several associations, including the American Society of Anesthesiology, recommend fasting for at least 2 hours for liquids and 6 hours for solids before a procedure. A retrospective study involving a considerable number of patients (n=1916) over three years of enrollment showed no patients requiring emergency intubation or developing aspiration pneumonia after the procedure.

Given the scarce data prior to an invasive coronary study, Woods et al. conducted this work with the aim of assessing the need for fasting for conscious sedation before elective coronary procedures.

The study was prospective, randomized, and conducted at a single center in the United States. The primary objective was to compare the safety of a healthy, slightly acidic diet (low-fat, low-cholesterol, and low-sodium foods) before coronary angiography versus following the standard fasting guidelines. The secondary objective was to evaluate patient satisfaction and comfort.

Read also: Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Concomitant Transcatheter Intervention: Can We?

The study included patients from the cardiac critical care unit, scheduled for cardiac catheterization with conscious sedation and analgesia. Patients with gastric emptying disorders such as chronic nausea, significant hiatal hernia, and enteral feeding, and subjects requiring emergency catheterization were excluded.

The study sample included 197 patients (100 with a healthy diet until the time of catheterization and 97 who fasted for at least 6 hours for solids), with an average age of 62.7 years and male predominance (62.4%). Only diagnostic studies were performed in most cases (57.4%), with angina (70.6%), SCASEST (13.2%), or unstable angina (6.1%) being the main reasons for the invasive study.

Read also: Should We Treat Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in TAVI?

The satisfaction score reported by patients was significantly higher in the healthy diet group (1.3 vs 3.1; p<0.001). Additionally, those subjects experienced lower thirst and hunger levels both before and after catheterization (thirst: 29.2% vs 48.7%, p<0.001; hunger: 22.6% vs 64.7%; p<0.001). No patient experienced aspiration pneumonia, intubation, or hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that in a selected population (without emergency catheterization), a healthy diet before the intervention—without the need for prolonged fasting—is safe. This approach represents an advancement in proper preparation and patient satisfaction, both regarding sedation and the elective coronary procedure.

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Fasting Versus a Heart-Healthy Diet Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Reference: Carri Woods, Michelle Wood, Angela Boylan, Mindy E. Flanagan, Jan Powers; Fasting Versus a Heart-Healthy Diet Before Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Crit Care 1 January 2024; 33 (1): 29–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024115.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....