ESC 2024 | SCOFF Trial: Fasting or No Fasting before Cardiac Catheterization Procedures

Millions of people undergo either diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures that require sedation. The aim of this study was to assess whether food restriction is necessary before sedation in these procedures. 

This was a randomized study in centers of Australia. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to two groups: the fasting group (6 hours with no solid food and 2 without any liquids) and the no restriction group (habitual diet).

The primary outcome was a composite of events including aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyper and hypo glycaemia. 

716 patients were included, mean age 69, 35% women. Primary end point occurred in 19.1% of the fasting group and 12% of the regular diet group. Upon intention to treat analysis, the net difference was -5.2% in favor of the no fast group, confirming non inferiority for this strategy.

Read also: ESC 2024 | SENIOR RITA: Invasive Strategy for Elderly Patients with ACS.

As regards patient satisfaction, it was significantly higher in the no fast group (15±4.3 vs. 11±4.0 satisfaction).

This study, together with the CHOW-NOW, TONIC and Fast-CIED studies, shows there is solid evidence in favor of the lack of benefit of fasting prior these kind of procedures. 

Presented by David Ferreia at Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30 thru September 2, London, England  


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...