ESC 2024 | SCOFF Trial: Fasting or No Fasting before Cardiac Catheterization Procedures

Millions of people undergo either diagnostic or therapeutic coronary procedures that require sedation. The aim of this study was to assess whether food restriction is necessary before sedation in these procedures. 

This was a randomized study in centers of Australia. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to two groups: the fasting group (6 hours with no solid food and 2 without any liquids) and the no restriction group (habitual diet).

The primary outcome was a composite of events including aspiration pneumonia, hypotension, hyper and hypo glycaemia. 

716 patients were included, mean age 69, 35% women. Primary end point occurred in 19.1% of the fasting group and 12% of the regular diet group. Upon intention to treat analysis, the net difference was -5.2% in favor of the no fast group, confirming non inferiority for this strategy.

Read also: ESC 2024 | SENIOR RITA: Invasive Strategy for Elderly Patients with ACS.

As regards patient satisfaction, it was significantly higher in the no fast group (15±4.3 vs. 11±4.0 satisfaction).

This study, together with the CHOW-NOW, TONIC and Fast-CIED studies, shows there is solid evidence in favor of the lack of benefit of fasting prior these kind of procedures. 

Presented by David Ferreia at Hot-Line Sessions, ESC Congress 2024, August 30 thru September 2, London, England  


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...