AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved ejection fraction (EF).

AHA 2024

Tirzepatide, a prolonged action antagonist of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptides (GLP-1), has a cardiovascular impact we still need to elucidate. 

This was a randomized, double blind study, 1:1, including patients with EF ≥50% and body mass index (BMI) ≥30. Participants were assigned to tirzepatide (up to 15 mg/week, subcutaneous) or placebo.

Primary end points were 1) cardiovascular mortality or CF worsening, and 2) change in quality of life measured with the Kansas Questionnaire. 

731 patients took part in the study, and were followed up to 104 weeks. The primary outcome occurred in 9.9% of tirzepatide patients vs. 15.3% of the placebo group (HR: 0.62, CI 95%: 0.41–0.95; p = 0.026). When breaking down these results, event reduction was attributed mainly to a lower incidence of CF worsening (HR: 0.54, CI 95%: 0.34–0.85).

Read also: AHA 2024 – BPROAD.

As regards change in quality of life, the tirzepatide group showed significant improvement, with a 6.9 score difference (CI 95%: 3.3–10.6; p < 0.001) vs. placebo patients. Non-compliance rate was 6.3%, attributed mainly to gastrointestinal adverse events. 

Authors’ Conclusion: weekly treatment with tirzepatide showed significant reduction of the combined end point of cardiovascular mortality and CF worsening compared against placebo, in obese patients with preserved ejection fraction. 

Presented by Milton Packer at the Scientific Sessions 2024, American Heart Association, November 2024, Chicago, EEUU.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....