AHA 2024 | VANISH2 Trial

Cardiac defibrillator implants (CDIs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, approximately one third of patients with CDIs experience a discharge within 3 years after implantation, which has a negative impact in quality of life, increases hospitalization and reduces survival rate.

AHA 2024

At present, the two main pharmacological options to reduce the risk of VT are sotalol and amiodarone. Also, catheter ablation has been shown effective to reduce VT episodes, even though it has been associated to procedural risks. 

The VANISH2 compared the efficacy of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients with CDIs, ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT. This was a randomized, multicenter and open design study carried out in 22 centers across Canada, US and France. 

Eligible patients were assigned to sotalol (120 mg adjusted dose twice a day) or amiodarone (400 mg twice a day for four weeks, followed by 200 mg/day), vs. catheter ablation. 

Read also: AHA 2024 – BPROAD.

Primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, appropriate CDI shock, electric storms or VT treatment below CDI detection. Safety events were death, cardiovascular hospitalization or prolonged hospital stay. 

Between November 2016 and June 2022, 416 patients were included, followed up mean 4.3 years. Mean participant age was 67.7 ± 8.6 years, 95.1% were men, 40% diabetic and 63% had a history of coronary angioplasty. 

The primary outcome was seen in 50.7% of ablation patients and 60.6% of the medically treated patients, which represents a significant events rate reduction of 25% (HR 0.75, CI 95%: 0.58-0.97; P=0.03). When looking at the individual primary end point components, there was a non-significant reduction in mortality (HR 0.84, CI 95%: 0.56-1.24), appropriate CDI shock within 14 days (HR 0.75, CI 95%: 0.53-1.04) and electric storm within 14 days (HR 0.95, CI 95%: 0.63-1.42). Also, when looking at VT treatment below CDI threshold, there were fewer events in the invasive branch (HR 0.25, CI95% 0.13-0.55).

Read also: AHA 2024 | SUMMIT.

Authors’ Conclusion: In patients with a history of VT and ischemic cardiomyopathy, catheter ablation as first line of treatment was associated with significant reduction of the combined primary end point, including mortality and cardiac failure. 

Presented by John L. Sapp at the Scientific Sessions 2024, American Heart Association 2024, Chicago, EEUU.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....