COMPARE TAVI: One-Year Results of a Randomized Study Comapring Two Balloon-Expandable Valves

The COMPARE TAVI organization conducted direct comparison of new transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices against contemporary best practices. To that end, it conducted a study that included an all-comers population (that is with no strict exclusion) to assess short-term safety and long-term durability, and to extrapolate data representative of the general population.

The analyzed cohort involved TAVI procedures using balloon-expandable valves: Sapien (Sapien 3 and Sapien 3 Ultra) versus Myval (Myval and Myval Octacor). Selected patients underwent transfemoral access, and procedures were performed in accredited centers with a minimum of ≥75 implantation procedures annually by experienced operators.

The primary endpoint (PEP) was a composite of death, stroke, moderate/severe aortic regurgitation, and moderate/severe valve deterioration at one year. Upon demonstrating non-inferiority between devices, TAVI-related complications, implant success, and need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation were evaluated.

The study included a total of 1031 patients from three high-volume centers in Denmark (750 TAVI procedures annually). The average age was 81.1 years; 40% of subjects were women, and 79% had an STS score <4.

Read also: Sievers Type 1 Bicuspid Valves: Which to Use?

In the balloon-expandable valve analysis, the Sapien group had a 13% incidence of the PEP, compared to 13.6% in the Myval group, with a risk difference of -0.9% (p=0.02), confirming non-inferiority between both groups after one year of follow-up.

An analysis of individual PEP components showed a higher trend towards moderate/severe aortic regurgitation and increased PPM implantation in the Myval group. Regarding secondary endpoints, the Sapien group had a higher incidence of moderate to severe prosthesis-patient mismatch.

Authors’ conclusion: Myval was non-inferior to Sapien concerning the evaluated PEP.

Presented by Henrik Nissen at Top Late-Breaking Trials, PCR London Valves, November 24, 2024, London, Great Britain.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...