TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in four sizes (44 mm, 48 mm, 52 mm, and 56 mm) and is implanted using a 28-Fr transfemoral access.

TRISCEND II: Reemplazo transcatéter vs tratamiento médico en insuficiencia tricúspidea 

The TRISCEND II study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the EVOQUE system compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). It included patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) who experienced heart failure symptoms and were already under OMT at the time of inclusion. Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months, ejection fraction <25%, severe right ventricular dysfunction, or severe pulmonary hypertension were excluded from the trial.

A total of 400 patients were randomized 2:1 to either transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) with the EVOQUE device or OMT alone. The average participant age was 79.3 years, and 74.9% of subjects were women. Most patients (73%) experienced dyspnea classified as NYHA functional class III or IV, while 96% had atrial fibrillation, and 36% had an implantable pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

Successful implantation of the EVOQUE device was achieved in 95.4% of patients, with an average hospital stay of three days. Cardiovascular mortality was higher in the OMT group (7.8% vs. 5.7%). Clinical benefit was measured using the win probability ratio, which was 2.02 in favor of TTVR, thus indicating that patients treated with the EVOQUE device had nearly double the likelihood of clinical improvement compared to the control group.

Read also: COMPARE TAVI: One-Year Results of a Randomized Study Comapring Two Balloon-Expandable Valves.

From a hemodynamic perspective, TTVR with the EVOQUE system significantly reduced TR to mild or less in almost all patients. This reduction led to a significant improvement in symptoms, better functionality, and improved quality of life after one year of follow-up.

Presented by Raj Makkar at Top Late-Breaking Trials, PCR London Valves, November 24, 2024, London, Great Britain.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...