ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we continue anticoagulation therapy while cancer remains active or under treatment. 

ACC 2025

The authors hypothesis is that the use of a reduced dose of anticoagulants might offer similar benefits in terms of efficacy and better safety vs. standard doses when treating cancer related VTE. 

To assess this hypothesis, a double blind and non-inferiority randomized study was carried out, for the prevention of recurrent VTE, as well as a superiority analysis to assess clinically relevant bleeding. Patients were randomized to receiving apixaban reduce dose (2.5 mg twice a day) vs standard (5 mg twice a day), and were stratified according to cancer type and venous thromboembolic compromise (PE with or without DVT or isolated DVT). 

Primary end points at 12 months were:

  • Efficacy primary end point: VTE recurrence (symptomatic recurrence, incidental VTE or VTE related death).
  • Bleeding related secondary end points: major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. 

1,766 patients from 121 centers in 11 countries were included. Mean patient age was 67.4; 43.4% were men, 43.4% had a history of VTE, and 75.5% presented proximal PE±DVT. Breast cancer was the most frequent (22.7%), followed by colorectal (15.3%), with 65.8% of cases presenting metastasis. 

Read also: STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes.

The efficacy primary end point showed non-inferiority for reduced vs standard dose (HR 0.76 [0.41-1.41]; p for non-inferiority = 0.001). As regards the safety secondary end point, reduced dose patients saw a significant reduction of 25% in hemorrhagic event incidence (HR 0.75; CI 95% 0.58-0.97; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in mortality (HR 0.96; CI 95% 0.86-1.06; p = 0.42).

Conclusions

Cancer patients completing six months of anticoagulation therapy with apixaban reduced dose did not show non-inferiority vs standard dose in the prevention of recurrent thromboembolic events and presented a better safety profile. 

Presented by Isabelle Mahé in Late-Breaking Clinical Trials ACC 25, march 29, Chicago, EE.UU.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation with a Self-Expanding Valve: Outcomes at 3 Years

Pulmonary regurgitation (PR) is a common condition in patients who have undergone surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot or other pathologies involving the right...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...