Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute myocardial infarction recurrence (AMI). However, the clinical benefit of preloading DAPT, pretreatment with aspirin and P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, remains controversial, and the most recent European guidelines advise against its use in patients with non ST elevation ACS (NST-ACS).

The aim of this study carried out by Goh et al. was to assess the prevalence of preloading DAPT and its clinical outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients in Victoria, Australia, included in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) between 2014 and 2021.

42,453 PCI procedures done for ACS were looked at; 79% of these patients received DAPT prior intervention (n=33,520). Pretreated patients were generally younger and presented fewer comorbidities, such as peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, kidney failure and a store of revascularization surgery. The most used antiaggregant was ticagrelor, vs thienopyridine inhibitors (59.5% vs. 23.4%).

At raw analysis, the pretreated group presented lower inhospital mortality (2.6% vs. 5.6%; p<0.001) and at 30 days (3.3% vs. 6.4%; p<0.001), as well as lower major cardiovascular events incidence (MACE) at 30 days (5.5% vs. 8.8%; p<0.001) and lower major bleeding rate (1.0% vs. 1.7%; p<0.001). However, after adjusting form variables with multivariable analysis, no significant differences were found in total mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis. 

DAPT preloading was independently associated with reduced incidence of major bleeding at 30 days (OR 0.79; CI95%: 0.65–0.96; p=0.02), particularly in the NST-ACS subgroup. An exploratory analysis showed the use of thienopyridines might be associated with lower MACE rate vs ticagrelor (OR 0.81; CI95%: 0.70–0.94; p=0.006).

Read also: Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

When stratifying by presentation type (SCASEST vs. SCACEST), no significant differences were found as regards mortality or MACE.

Conclusions

In this contemporary cohort of ACS patients in Australia, DAPT preloading was common practice, though it was not independently associated with reduced mortality, MACE or stent thrombosis. 

Original Title: Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice.

Reference: Goh SH, Batchelor R, Dinh D, Brennan A, Peters S, Stub D, Reid C, Chan W, Liew D, Wilson W, Lefkovits J; VCOR investigators. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Outcomes in Contemporary Practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31520. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40195707. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....