The use of a paclitaxel eluting balloon in small vessels

Original title: A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing a Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Vessels. The BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) Study Reference: Referencia: Azeem Latib et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;()doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020

The utility of paclitaxel-eluting balloons to treat in-stent restenosis is known but data for novo lesions is more limited. 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for the reduction of restenosis in small vessels. This multicenter and prospective study randomized 182 patients with lesions in small vessels (reference diameter <2.8 mm) to receive a paclitaxel eluting balloon and provisional conventional stent (n = 90) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent. 

The primary endpoint of non-inferiority was late lumen loss with a delta of 0.25 mm. Secondary end points were binary restenosis, TLR and MACE, (death, myocardial infarction and revascularization), at 6 months. Both groups were well balanced except for the smallest diameter in PEB-treated vessels, (2.15 ± 0.27 mm vs. 2.25 ± 0.24 mm, p = 0.003). 20% of the PEB group required a conventional stent rescue after dilation. 

The primary end point was significantly lower with PEB compared with PES, (0.08 ± 0.38 mm vs. 0.29 ± 0.44 mm, p for noninferiority <0.001, p for superiority = 0.001). At 6 months both were similar in binary restenosis, (PEB 8.9% versus PES 14.1%, P = 0.25), TLR, (PEB 4.4% versus PES 7.6%, p = 0.37), and MACE, (PEB 7.8% versus DES 13.2%, P = 0.77).

Conclusion 

Small-vessel angioplasty using PEB had a lower late lumen loss with similar restenosis and revascularization than paclitaxel-eluting stents at 6 months.

Editorial Comment:

The results are promising, especially considering that the average size of the vessels was <2.5 mm. It would be very interesting to track this in a longer-term study and with a primary clinical purpose as well as a comparison against edge limus eluting stents.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...