The use of a paclitaxel eluting balloon in small vessels

Original title: A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing a Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Vessels. The BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) Study Reference: Referencia: Azeem Latib et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;()doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020

The utility of paclitaxel-eluting balloons to treat in-stent restenosis is known but data for novo lesions is more limited. 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for the reduction of restenosis in small vessels. This multicenter and prospective study randomized 182 patients with lesions in small vessels (reference diameter <2.8 mm) to receive a paclitaxel eluting balloon and provisional conventional stent (n = 90) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent. 

The primary endpoint of non-inferiority was late lumen loss with a delta of 0.25 mm. Secondary end points were binary restenosis, TLR and MACE, (death, myocardial infarction and revascularization), at 6 months. Both groups were well balanced except for the smallest diameter in PEB-treated vessels, (2.15 ± 0.27 mm vs. 2.25 ± 0.24 mm, p = 0.003). 20% of the PEB group required a conventional stent rescue after dilation. 

The primary end point was significantly lower with PEB compared with PES, (0.08 ± 0.38 mm vs. 0.29 ± 0.44 mm, p for noninferiority <0.001, p for superiority = 0.001). At 6 months both were similar in binary restenosis, (PEB 8.9% versus PES 14.1%, P = 0.25), TLR, (PEB 4.4% versus PES 7.6%, p = 0.37), and MACE, (PEB 7.8% versus DES 13.2%, P = 0.77).

Conclusion 

Small-vessel angioplasty using PEB had a lower late lumen loss with similar restenosis and revascularization than paclitaxel-eluting stents at 6 months.

Editorial Comment:

The results are promising, especially considering that the average size of the vessels was <2.5 mm. It would be very interesting to track this in a longer-term study and with a primary clinical purpose as well as a comparison against edge limus eluting stents.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

OCT- and IVUS-Guided Coronary Angioplasty in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has reduced mortality in the acute phase. However, recurrent ACS and target vessel...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...