The use of a paclitaxel eluting balloon in small vessels

Original title: A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing a Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Vessels. The BELLO (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization) Study Reference: Referencia: Azeem Latib et al J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;()doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020

The utility of paclitaxel-eluting balloons to treat in-stent restenosis is known but data for novo lesions is more limited. 

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB) compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) for the reduction of restenosis in small vessels. This multicenter and prospective study randomized 182 patients with lesions in small vessels (reference diameter <2.8 mm) to receive a paclitaxel eluting balloon and provisional conventional stent (n = 90) or a paclitaxel-eluting stent. 

The primary endpoint of non-inferiority was late lumen loss with a delta of 0.25 mm. Secondary end points were binary restenosis, TLR and MACE, (death, myocardial infarction and revascularization), at 6 months. Both groups were well balanced except for the smallest diameter in PEB-treated vessels, (2.15 ± 0.27 mm vs. 2.25 ± 0.24 mm, p = 0.003). 20% of the PEB group required a conventional stent rescue after dilation. 

The primary end point was significantly lower with PEB compared with PES, (0.08 ± 0.38 mm vs. 0.29 ± 0.44 mm, p for noninferiority <0.001, p for superiority = 0.001). At 6 months both were similar in binary restenosis, (PEB 8.9% versus PES 14.1%, P = 0.25), TLR, (PEB 4.4% versus PES 7.6%, p = 0.37), and MACE, (PEB 7.8% versus DES 13.2%, P = 0.77).

Conclusion 

Small-vessel angioplasty using PEB had a lower late lumen loss with similar restenosis and revascularization than paclitaxel-eluting stents at 6 months.

Editorial Comment:

The results are promising, especially considering that the average size of the vessels was <2.5 mm. It would be very interesting to track this in a longer-term study and with a primary clinical purpose as well as a comparison against edge limus eluting stents.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...