Complex angioplasty with ventricular assist

Original title: Real-Word of the Impella 2.5 Circulatory Support System in Complex High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The USpella Registry Reference: Brijeshwar maini, et al. Catheterization and Cardiovscular Intervention

For about a decade angioplasty has begun to be performed in increasingly complex patients (PE) such as those with left coronary trunk injury, 3-vessel injury, poor ventricular function and surgically discarded. 

A ventricular assist device may improve outcomes in this specific group of patients. The aim of this prospective registry, that included 175 PE in 18 centers, was to evaluate the results of high-risk coronary angioplasty with the use of the ventricular assist system Impella 2.5 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA).

Were considered high risk those who had poor left ventricular function, complex coronary anatomy and/or severe comorbidities. We excluded PE currently on ST elevation infarction or cardiogenic shock and those with contra-indications to the use of the device, (left ventricular thrombus, mechanical aortic valve or severe peripheral vascular disease). 

Follow-up was performed at 30 days and 12 months. The primary endpoint was MACE (death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, cardiac surgery or peripheral, stroke or TIA) at 30 days and the secondary endpoint was safety, (injuries in the aortic or mitral valve, impaired renal function, bleeding requiring surgery or transfusion, hypotension, hemolysis, infection, device malfunction, femoral hematoma> 4 cm., and vascular complications).

The device was implanted before angioplasty in this population with high risk characteristics, average age of 74 years, 47% diabetic, 33% renal failure, 30% had a previous infarction, 69% with ejection fraction <35%, 66% heart failure class III-IV, 89% with multivessel disease and 56% with severe injury unprotected LMCA. The SYNTAX score was 37 ± 16, STS mortality was 6 ± 6% and STS morbidity 31 ± 16%. 66% of PT was surgery rejected. The primary endpoint MACE at 30 days was 8% (4% death, AMI 1.1%, stroke 0.6%, revascularization 0.6% and surgery or peripheral cardiovascular emergency 1.7%). The 6 month and 12 month survival rate was 91% and 88% respectively. Secondary endpoints were safety; renal failure 2.8%, vascular bleeding requiring surgery 0.6%, hypotension 3.4%, VT or CPR 2.8%, vascular complications 3.4%, there was no hemolysis, damage to the aortic valve, mitral or malfunction of the Impella.

Conclusion 

The use of the Impella 2.5 in high-risk angioplasty was feasible and safe in the real world giving positive results in the short and medium term.

Editorial Comment:

This analysis did not include emergency patients, (AMI with ST elevation and cardiogenic shock), in which it would have been interesting to use the device. The development of new, more effective devices and better drugs will certainly act positively on the development of high-risk procedures.

Courtesy of Calos Fava, MD
Interventional Cardiologist.
Fundación Favaloro – Argentina

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...