Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology

 

The evolution in experience of the operators together with the continuous improvement of devices have allowed new procedures that we did not perform a few years ago and that we never imagined possible, not even for the most enthusiastic of interventional cardiologists.

Not a huge intellectual effort is required to say that the future will continue inexorably in the same direction. The same is happening in other specialties besides cardiology where surgery is being performed on increasingly complex cases.

However, it is logical that the progresses of science are not all positive news. More complex procedures take longer and automatically have higher radiation doses not only for the patient but also for medical and non-medical operators in the room.

In this sense, we believe it’s beneficial to highlight our concern about this issue in a multi-disciplinary framework group dedicated to radiation protection in interventional cardiology within the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) based in Vienna, Austria. Writing about “Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology”, it was decided to focus in the first instance on professional care and leave care of the patient until later.

We tried to write a practical approach where operators and ward staff can identify the most useful radiation protection measures and hope that their knowledge will influence an adequate prevention of stochastic as well as deterministic effects in the future. It gave us real satisfaction when a prestigious magazine, “Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions”, accepted our work for publication and, as such, we want to share this with all SOLACI partners.

Dr. Ariel Durán, FACC
SOLACI Radiation Safety Committee

recomendaciones_proteccion_radiologica
Ariel Durán

More articles by this author

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...

Transcatheter Deep Vein Arterialization in Critical Limb Ischemia Without Revascularization Options

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients without conventional revascularization options represents one of the most challenging scenarios within peripheral arterial disease, with 1-year major amputation...