Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology

 

The evolution in experience of the operators together with the continuous improvement of devices have allowed new procedures that we did not perform a few years ago and that we never imagined possible, not even for the most enthusiastic of interventional cardiologists.

Not a huge intellectual effort is required to say that the future will continue inexorably in the same direction. The same is happening in other specialties besides cardiology where surgery is being performed on increasingly complex cases.

However, it is logical that the progresses of science are not all positive news. More complex procedures take longer and automatically have higher radiation doses not only for the patient but also for medical and non-medical operators in the room.

In this sense, we believe it’s beneficial to highlight our concern about this issue in a multi-disciplinary framework group dedicated to radiation protection in interventional cardiology within the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) based in Vienna, Austria. Writing about “Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology”, it was decided to focus in the first instance on professional care and leave care of the patient until later.

We tried to write a practical approach where operators and ward staff can identify the most useful radiation protection measures and hope that their knowledge will influence an adequate prevention of stochastic as well as deterministic effects in the future. It gave us real satisfaction when a prestigious magazine, “Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions”, accepted our work for publication and, as such, we want to share this with all SOLACI partners.

Dr. Ariel Durán, FACC
SOLACI Radiation Safety Committee

recomendaciones_proteccion_radiologica
Ariel Durán

More articles by this author

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Chronic Stent Recoil and Its Long-Term Effects

The evolution of stent technology—including new scaffold designs, thinner struts, and more biocompatible polymers—has brought about an emerging concern: the late loss of structural...

PROSPECT II Substudy: Relationship Between Different Levels of hs-CRP and Vulnerable Plaque Characteristics in Patients with NSTEMI

Inflammation plays a key role in the onset and progression of atherosclerosis and has been linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular events, regardless...

Aspirin vs. Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 Month of ACS: Subgroup Analysis Based on Bleeding Risk and MI Type

Current guidelines still recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 12 months following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the standard treatment in patients with acute...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Polymer-Free vs. Biodegradable Polymer Stents: SORT OUT IX 5-Year Outcomes

In a constant strive to achieve life time management, interventional cardiologists focus on optimizing coronary scaffolds, which calls for the development of devices with...

Three-Year Outcomes of Mitral Valve-in-Valve Therapy with Balloon-Expandable Valves in the United States

Gentileza del Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral Valve-in-Valve (MViV) implantation with balloon-expandable valves has become a solid alternative for patients with degenerated mitral bioprostheses. However,...

Edge-to-Edge Treatment in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is characterized by severe ventricular dysfunction, most often of ischemic origin. It is frequently associated with severe mitral regurgitation (MR), either...