Severe Mitral Insufficiency Following Mitral Valvotomy

Original title: Acute Severe Mitral Regurgitation Following Balloon Mitral Valvulotomy: Echocardiographic Feature, Operative Finfing and Outcome in 50 Surgical Cases. Reference: Manjunath C. Nanjappa, et al. Catherization and Cardiovascular Intervention 81:603-608 (2013)

Severe Mitral Insufficiency Following Mitral Valvotomy (VPM) is a major complication; though not frequent, (0.9%-2%) it is life threatening and requires resolution through valve replacement.

The aim of this series was to analyze the evolution of patients with acute severe mitral insufficiency following VPM. 3855 patients undergoing VPM were analyzed, 50 patients (1.3%) presented ASMR after procedure and where referred to surgery. Wilkins score was ≤8 in 23 of those 50 patients. The most frequent signs of ASMR were hypotension and hypoxia followed by orthopnea and acute pulmonary edema.

The most frequent cause of severe MR was posterior mitral leaflet tear (36 patients), it was also observe a paracommisural tear with annular involvement (7 patients), posterior mitral leaflet tear (5 patients) and chordal tear (2ptes). The time from end of procedure to replacement surgery was between 3 and 96 hrs, and 6 patients died in this period (12%).

Patients were analyzed according to the moment of surgery and were divided in 2 groups: 24 hrs (11 patients). Both groups shared similar characteristics, mortality being significantly higher in the second group (1/39 vs 5/11, p<0.001).

Conclusion: 

Hypotension and hypoxia were the most common symptoms of Severe Mitral Insufficiency Following Mitral Valvotomy and posterior mitral leaflet tear was the most frequent cause. In this scenario, early valve replacement is most recommended.

Editorial comment: 

Mitral Valvotomy is a complex procedure that presents a low complications rate but these can be severe. Clinical, hemodynamic evaluation, with eco-Doppler is essential seeing that they not only help evaluate results, they also help diagnose complications and make the correct and timely decisions. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiologist.
Favaloro Foundation. Argentina.

 

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...