Aspirin, Clopidogrel and Warfarin. Is it safe or is a triple scheme necessary?

Original title: Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial Reference: Dewilde WJ et al. Lancet. 2013 Mar 30;381(9872):1107-15

The question to answer was simple, relevant, and is increasingly frequent in everyday practice: what to do when a patient who is anticoagulated has to undergo angioplasty? Therapeutics with single or double antiplatelet therapy with anticoagulation? Researchers in the Dutch trial, an open-design, randomized and controlled 573 patients to two groups: dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel versus clopidogrel alone, with both branches obviously receiving warfarin. The results showed that taking aspirin out of the therapy scheme reduces the risk of bleeding and does not increase the risk of thrombotic events.

The total bleeding was reduced very significantly, (HR 0.36, meaning a decrease of 64%), and although this was from a predominance of minor bleeding, major bleeding also showed a similar trend with similar HR values, ( HR 0.56 major bleeding TIMI, HR 0.40 severe bleeding GUSTO). This indicates that although the difference in major bleeding was not statistically significant due to sample size, the trend was in the same direction and of similar magnitude. As for thrombotic events, although an increase in such cases was not found in the absence of aspirin, the study is small and lacks sufficient power to safely make this statement so these results must be confirmed by other studies. In particular, one cannot know whether removing aspirin in between will not cause more cases of stent thrombosis, a phenomenon of rare occurrence but catastrophic. Other interesting questions are: would the results be the same with new anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs and what would a third group have shown with aspirin plus anticoagulation but without clopidogrel?

It was considered that this test could be the “first nail in the coffin” of aspirin because it may no longer be necessary to consider it is required in all future antithrombotic studies of coronary patients. Patients at high risk of bleeding and anticoagulated patients are the subject of studies with new antithrombotic drugs in certain clinical scenarios and could be treated, (and it may be useful to be), without aspirin. 

Courtesy of a Dr. Alejandro Lakowsky
MTSAC.

Dr. Alejandro Lakowsky para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...