The Importance of TIMI 3 flow in primary angioplasty

Original title: Predicitors of suboptimal TIMI flow alter primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the HORIZON-AMI trial. Reference: Adriano Caixeta et al.  Eurointervention 2013;9:220-227

Primary angioplasty showed greater efficacy than thrombolytics but one out of every four patients cannot achieve TIMI 3 flow.

The Horizons-AMI trial randomized 3,602 patients to receive bivalirudin or heparin plus inhibitors IIb IIIa and after angiography a second randomization took place to DES or a conventional stent. The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the angiographic predictors of both clinical and suboptimal procedural flow (TIMI <3) after stent implantation. The secondary objective was the impact after three years of suboptimal flow, (TIMI 0-2 versus TIMI 3). Angioplasty was performed in 3,345 patients, (92.9%), of which 2,758, (87.1%), had final TIMI 3 flow.

Those who had TIMI

After 30 days and three years, end TIMI flow

Conclusion:

In this large study the lack of restoration of TIMI 3 flow was associated with older age, past infarction, TIMI flow 0-1, lesion length and was a strong predictor of mortality.

Commentary:

This study shows that the failure to achieve TIMI 3 is associated with higher mortality at three years, than the PAMI, Cadillac and Apex IMA studies had shown at six months. It may be important to have a good pre-hospital service where trained personnel are available to bypass the emergency department and refer the patient directly to the catheterization laboratory. 

Courtesy of Dr Carlos Fava.
Interventional Cardiologist.
Favaloro Foundation.
Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Dr. Carlos Fava para SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...