Difference in mortality with surgery versus angioplasty in diabetic multivessel patients

Original title: Comparison of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reference: Verma S. et al. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;Epub ahead of print.

The FREEDOM study was the last of the randomized studies that compared the results of surgery versus coronary angioplasty in diabetic multivessel patients showing a reduction in the relative risk of death, heart attack and stroke by 30% in favor of surgery. While the results of this work were clear, previous studies still left some room for doubt, especially for hard endpoints such as death. 

This study is a meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials in diabetic multivessel patients to surgery or angioplasty. Of all the studies analyzed, 4 used stents (ERACI II, ARTS, SoS and MASS II) and the other 4 used, drug-eluting stents (FREEDOM, SYNTAX, and VA CARDS CARDia). 

At 5 years follow-up  a lower mortality rate was observed with surgery (RR 0.67, CI 0.52 to 0.86, P = 0.002) that was not evident at one year (RR 0.99, CI 0.72 to 1.37, P = .97). The difference in mortality in favor of surgery was similar regardless of the type of stent used (BMS or DES). The rate of nonfatal myocardial infarction was similar both after a year as after five years between the two strategies (RR 1.01, P = 0.98 and RR 0.76, p = 0.3 respectively). The surgery was associated with an increased risk of stroke especially in following year (RR 2.4, P = 0.01 at one year and RR 1.72, P = 0.005 at 5 years). As expected, the greatest difference is given by the rate of revascularization that benefits surgery significantly from the start of monitoring (RR 0.36, p <0.0001 and RR 0.41, P <0.0001, respectively). According to this meta-analysis, the mortality difference disappears when comparing surgery and angioplasty in patients without diabetes (RR 1.03, CI 0.77 to 1.37, P = .78). 

Conclusion: 

Surgical revascularization of diabetic multivessel patients decreases long-term mortality by about one third compared with angioplasty beyond the type of stent used. 

Editorial Comment: 

Unfortunately it is not possible to analyze the anatomical complexity as the SYNTAX score was introduced after the publication of several of the studies analyzed. These findings do not necessarily have to lead to surgery for all diabetics since the presence of 3 vessels is quite heterogeneous. The team discussion of each particular case and the opinion of the patient are essential. 

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....