Percutaneous closure versus surgical of the perimembranous interventricular communication

Original title: Transcatheter versus Surgical Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reference: Jian Yang et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; Epub ahead of print.

 

The ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital heart disease, and perimembranous being the most common variant. In countries like USA surgery is considered the treatment of choice for this variant of VSD since the initial studies on percutaneous closure had a high chance (2.9 to 5.7 %) of complete atrioventricular block. However in developing countries like China and India, percutaneous closure has shown low mortality and morbidity using specially modified nitinol devices for perimembranous variant.

Between January 2009 and July 2010, 465 patients aged 3 to 12 years diagnosed with perimembranous VSD were evaluated clinically and with transthoracic echocardiogram in 3 high-volume centers of China, finally leaving 229 who met the criteria for inclusion and exclusion be randomized to surgery (n = 115) and percutaneous closure (n = 114). Patients randomized to percutaneous closure received the device Shanghai pmVSD occluder (Lepu Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China), designed especially for perimembranous VSD. In the case of surgery,direct suture or Dacron or pericardial patch was used, depending on the size.

Mean age was 5.8 ± 2.4 years in the surgical group versus 5.5 ± 2.6 in the percutaneous group (p = 0.398). There were no differences in other baseline characteristics including the size of the defect.

No deaths, strokes or other major complications were observed in-hospital. There were 32 (32.3 %) minor complications in the surgical group versus 7 (6.9 %) in the percutaneous group (p < 0.001). After two years, no deaths were reported, neurological deficits, thrombus embolism, endocarditis, or complete atrioventricular blocks. The end diastolic volume assessed by echocardiography (Z score) decreased significantly in both groups. 

Conclusion

Both surgical and percutaneous closures were effective and showed excellent mid-term results for treating perimembranous ventricular septal defects. In this paper, percutaneous closure had fewer incidences of myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, hospital stay, economic costs, and recovery time.

Editorial comment

Infundibular and tubular types of Perimembranous VSD were technically more simple to treat percutaneously  than the aneurysmal type, if so far possible, may need more care.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

Transcatheter Paravalvular Leak Closure: Mid-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

Paravalvular leaks (PVL) are a frequent complication following surgical valve replacement, occurring in 5% to 18% of prosthetic valves. Incidence varies according to valve...

After a Major Bleeding Event in Atrial Fibrillation: When Should Left Atrial Appendage Closure Be Considered?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who experience a major bleeding event represents a complex clinical scenario in which percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)...

New Balloon-Expandable Aortic Valve: 30-Day Outcomes in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus

As transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) continues to expand toward younger patients with longer life expectancy, factors such as valve hemodynamic performance, durability, and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...