Fluorography reduces radiation exposure of patients and operators without affecting the effectiveness of diagnostic coronary angiography

Original title: Effectiveness of Fluorography Versus Cineangiography at Reducing Radiation Exposure During Diagnostic Coronary Angiography. Reference: Shah B et al. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;113(7):1093-8.

Coronary angiography is the gold standard for defining obstructive coronary disease. However, radiation exposure remains an unclear and unwanted risk. The aim of this study was to determine whether the new digital fluorography techniques successfully reduce radiation exposure of patients referred for coronary angiography with < 115 cm abdominal circumference and > 60 ml / min glomerular filtration rate where randomized to fluorography (n = 25) or cineangiography (n = 25). The fluorography group underwent coronary angiography using retrospectively stored fluorography with repeat injection under cineangiography only when needed for better resolution per operator’s discretion.  Primary end point was patient radiation exposure measured by radiochromic film.

Secondary end points included secondary radiation measured by kerma area product and air kerma at the interventional reference point (Ka, r) and operator radiation exposure measured by a dosimeter.  

Patient radiation exposure resulted significantly lower in the fluoroscopy group, compared to the cineangiography group (158.2 mGy [76.5-210.2] vs 272.5 mGy [163,3-314] respectively; p=0.001), kerma – area product (1323 mGy . m2 [826-1765] vs 3.451 mGy . m2 [2464-4818]; p < 0,001 ), and Ka, r (175mGy [ 112-252 ] vs 558 mGy [313-621 ]; p < 0.001). This represents a relative reduction of 42 %, 62 % and 69 %, respectively.

Though statistically not significant, operator exposure followed the same trend, (fluorography 2.35 mGy [1.24-6.30] vs cineangiography 5.03 mGy [2,48-7,80], p =0.059). 

Conclusion

Fluorography in a select group of patients during coronary angiography with repeated injection under cineangiography only when necessary, successfully reduced patient radiation exposure.

Editorial Comment:

The new coronary cineangiography has largely overcome several specialty limitations with numerous techniques. One of them is the possibility to store fluoroscopy imaging without the need of cineangiography. In this study we observe fluorography significantly reduces patient exposure and marks a positive trend to reduce operator radiation exposure without affecting diagnostic effectiveness.  In a time when invasive procedures of increased exposure have exponentially grown in number, this choice could have a positive impact both in patients and operators. A Limitation to this practice is that this kind of technology might not be available in all centers. 

Courtesy of Dr Matías Sztejfman
Interventional Cardiologist.
Güemes Hospital.
Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Dr. Matías Sztejfman

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...