Less Definite Thrombosis with Everolimus Eluting Stents

Original title: Three-Year Outcomes After Revascularization With Everolimus-and Sirulimus -Eluting Stents From the SORT OUT IV Trial. Reference: Lisette Okkels Jensen et al. J Am CollCardiolIntv, 2014;7: 840-8.

Drug eluting stents (DES) have been shown to safely and effectively reduce restenosis compared to bare-metal stents. While the risk of thrombosis remains a matter of concern when it comes to first generation DES, several studies have shown reduced thrombosis risk with second generation stents. This study compared the safety and efficacy of sirolimus (SES) vs. everolimus (EES) eluting stents as to late thrombosis at 3 year follow up of a SORT OUT IV group of patients. 

2,774 patients were randomized, 1,390 to EES and 1,384 to SES, all of them with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome and, at least, one >50% lesion. Primary end point was MACE and definite thrombosis. Double antiagregation therapy was administered from stenting procedure to one year. The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar.

At 3 years, MACE occurred in 9.8% of EES patients and 11.1% of SES patients. We also observed a definite thrombosis rate of 0.2% in EES patients vs. 1.4% in SES patients, attributable to very late thrombosis (> 12 months) in 0.1% EES vs. 0.8% SES.

Conclusion

The 3 year follow up did no show superiority as regards MACE; however, it did find a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis presentation, both global and very late in the EES group, especially the latter. 

Editorial Comment

The SORT OUT IV, as well as the following studies that used their data to assess the efficacy of both stents in different subgroups, obtained similar MACE rates. This is the first time both stents are compared to assess their performance with respect to very late thrombosis. The study showed a significant reduction of in-stent thrombosis in the EES group that maximized in the late stages of treatment, when patients were on-aspirin only. The number of thrombosis events in both groups was not enough to modify MACE rates, but with a larger population, this figures would also have seen a reduction.

Courtesy of Dr. Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga.
Interventional Cardiologist. International Clinic. Lima, Perú.

Alfonso Francisco Balaguer Quiroga

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....