Frequency, indication and evolution of emergency cardiac surgery during TAVI

Original Title: Emergent cardiac surgery during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): insight the Edwards SAPIENS Aortic Bioprosthesis Outcome (SOURCE) registry. Reference: Holger Eggerbrecht, et al. EuroIntervention 2014;10:975-81

SOURCE register data from patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapiens valve, were analyzed; out of 2307 patients, 27 (1.2%) required emergency cardiac surgery (ECS).

Valve stenosis was equally severe, but the aortic annulus diameter was larger in those that required ECS; this difference increased when using a

ECS causes were embolism/migration in 9 patients, aortic injury (dissection and perforation) in 7, aortic annulus rupture in 3, severe aortic regurgitation in 3, myocardial tamponade in 2, transapical bleeding in 1, heart block in 1 and suboptimal valve deployment in 1. 10 ECS patients died within 72 hours (VARC-2). At 30 days, mortality was 51.9% vs. 7.8% of those that did not require ECS (p<0.001). At 90 days, mortality was even higher, reaching 70% (19/27).

Conclusion

ECS rates in the context of TAVI is very low (1.2%), it should be performed with no delay and is associated with a 52% mortality rate at 30 days. Severe complications with acute evolution (annulus rupture or aortic injury) presented even higher mortality rates.

Commentary

This study, as well as others, has shown that although ECS during TAVI is not a frequent procedure, it unfortunately has high mortality rates within 90 days. This depends on the type of complications it may cause, and calls for a technological effort to develop more flexible and better adjusted valves to avoid these complications. 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava
Interventional Cardiologist
Favaloro Foundation – Buenos Aires

Carlos Fava

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

ACC 2026 | FAST III: vFFR vs FFR in physiology-guided revascularization of intermediate coronary lesions

Physiological assessment of intermediate coronary lesions remains a cornerstone in decision-making for coronary revascularization. Although FFR continues to be one of the guideline-recommended references,...