TAO trial: Otamixaban without advantages as the only anticoagulant in acute coronary syndromes

Despite progress in antiplatelet, anticoagulant therapy and invasive strategy, patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome present an elevated risk of events. There is no consensus on the use of a single anticoagulant which can be administered in the Coronary Unit and also at the time of coronary intervention.

The anticoagulant direct factor Xa inhibitor, Otamixaban, inhibits the generation of thrombin with rapid onset and offset,  linear pharmacokinetics, predictable response and limited renal elimination which makes it an attractive option for use with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The purpose of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of otamixaban vs unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and invasive strategy. It was a double-blind, randomized controlled superiority study which randomized 13,229 patients to otamixaban vs unfractionated heparin plus eptifibatide at the time of intervention. The primary efficacy endpoint was combined death and infarction at 7 days that resulted in 5.5% of the otamixaban group vs 5.7% of the heparin/eptifibatide group (p=0.93). The primary safety endpoint of major or minor bleeding according to TIMI criteria was higher in the otamixaban group (3.1% vs 1.5%, p<0.001). The outcomes were consistent in all the prespecified groups.

Conclusion: 

Otamixaban does not reduce the incidence of ischemic events and increased bleeding in comparison with heparin plus eptifibatide in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome who received invasive strategy.

Editorial comment:

Otamixaban will be discontinued given the results of this work. Other works with new anticoagulants also failed to show positive outcomes with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome which would indicate that the antiplatelet aggregation plays a more important role than the anticoagulant in this scenario. 

Read article


P. Gabriel Steg
2013-09-02

Original title: Anticoagulation With Otamixaban and Ischemic Events in Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes The TAO Randomized Clinical Trial.

 

More articles by this author

INTIME: Home monitoring of severe heart failure patients gives promising results.

Rehospitalization or death due to worsening heart failure is often preceded by changes in clinical parameters, weight or arrhythmias. The home monitoring device has...

DECAAF: Pre ablation magnetic resonance in patients with atrial fibrillation is capable of detecting the degree of fibrosis and predicting the success of...

260 patients with atrial fibrillation were included who underwent nuclear magnetic resonance 30 days before ablation and 90 days following. The patients were classified...

PRAGUE 14: Anti-thrombotic therapy before non-cardiac surgery may be associated with a higher incidence of bleeding.

The majority of coronary patients are under anti-thrombotic therapy and its interruption may increase cardiovascular risk, while on the other hand, continuation during a...

LINC: The LUCAS device failed to demonstrate benefit in cardiac arrest patients.

Each year between 300,000 and 400,000 people suffer an out-of-hospital heart attack in Europe. Only between 5% and 7% of these patients survive and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

UNICORN Technique to Prevent Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: Initial Results From a Multicenter Study

Coronary obstruction is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, TAV-in-TAV interventions, or in patients...

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...