Polymer Free Drug Coated Stent in High Bleeding Risk Patients with Only One Month DAPT

Original Title: Polymer-free Drug-Coated Coronary Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk
Reference: Philip Urban et al. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 14. [Epub ahead of print].

High bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI usually receive conventional bare metal stents (BMS) to allow the shortest possible DAPT (dual antiplatelet therapy), usually a month long. This study assessed the biolimus A9 polymer-free coated stent (BioFreedom stent, Biosensors, Europe). The biolimus A9 (also known as umirolimus) is a highly lipophilic sirolimus analogue that is released in a month.

The double blind trial randomized high bleeding risk patients to the coated polymer free stent vs. a very similar conventional stent. All patients received only one month DAPT.

Primary safety end point (tested for non-inferiority and superiority) was a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and in-stent thrombosis. Primary efficacy end point was clinically driven target vessel revascularization.

It included 2466 patients with more than one year follow up. In this period, 112 polymer-free DES patients (9.4%) vs. 154 (12.9%) BMS patients presented the safety end point (HR 0.71; CI 95% 0.56 to 0.91; p<0.001 for non-inferiority and p=0.005 for superiority).

During the same period, 59 patients (5.1%) in the polymer-free DES group vs. 113 (9.8%) in the BMS group underwent clinically driven target vessel revascularization (HR 0.5, CI 95% 0.37 to 0.69; p<0.001).

Conclusion
In those patients with high bleeding risk the biolimus polymer free A9 resulted superior to the conventional bare metal stent in terms of safety and efficacy with only one month of DAPT.

Editorial Comment
This study was designed to enroll high bleeding risk patients or patients that for any reason were no good candidates for prolonged DAPT. This high risk was reflected in a 7.2% bleeding rate (BARC 3 to 5) in both group, despite they only received one month DAPT. As a reference, the annual rate of bleeding in a standard population undergoing PCI is between 0,6 and 2,8%.
This new polymer free device is presented as a very good option for this group of patients that would have normally received conventional bare metal stents.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...