IVUS-XPL: IVUS superior to angiography for guiding DES implantation in long lesions

Original Title: Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. Presenter: Hong S-J.

Patients with long coronary lesions have better clinical results after a year of second generation DES implantation when interventions are guided by IVUS, instead of angiography. The benefit was attributed to a lower revascularization rate of ischemia driven target lesions. For the trial, carried out in 20 Korean centers, researchers included 1,400 patients (mean age 64; 69% male) with chest pain or evidence of myocardial ischemia and diffuse long coronary lesions (visually estimatedstent length of  ≥ 28 mm). All patients received the Xience Prime stent (Abbott Vascular) and dual ATP with aspirin and clopidogrel through6 months or more.

In patients randomized to IVUS guided stent implantation online IVUS measurements were used to select stent size and length; adjunct high-pressure dilation was performed at the discretion of the physicians based on IVUS findings.Physicians could perform IVUS at any step of PCI, but IVUS exam was mandatory after PCI.

The average stent length was 39.3 mm. During procedure, patients in the IVUS arm more frequently received adjunct post-dilation (76% vs 57%) and had a larger mean final balloon size (3.14 vs 3.04 mm; P <0.001 for both). As a result, patients who underwent IVUS-guided procedure had a higher minimum lumen diameter (2.64 vs 2.56 mm; P <0.001) and lower diameter stenosis (12.79% vs 13.74%; P = .04) on post-intervention quantitative coronary angiography.

Patients in the IVUS arm required ischemia driven target lesion revascularization 2.5% of times vs. 5% in the control group.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...