Spontaneous Regression of Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation with Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Original Title: Regression of Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation and Remodeling of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve. An Observation From the CoreValve U.S. Pivotal Trial. Reference: Jae K. Oh et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2015, online first.

The aim of this study was to describe the natural evolution and the clinical significance of paravalvular aortic insufficiency after valve replacement with self-expanding CoreValve.

Regression of paravalvular aortic regurgitation over time has been described but the mechanism behind this phenomenon remains unclear.
The study analyzed all patients with severe aortic stenosis included in the multicenter study CoreValve U.S. Pivotal Trial (Safety and Efficacy Study of the Medtronic CoreValve System in the Treatment of Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis in High Risk and Very High Risk Subjects Who Need Aortic Valve Replacement) at one year clinical and serial echocardiographic follow up. The self-expanding valve was implanted in 634 patients aged 82.7 ± 8.4 years.

When comparing echocardiogram measures prior to hospital discharge against measures at one month after procedure, a significant improvement was observed in AV mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area (2.08 ± 0.45 m/s vs. 1.99 ± 0.46 m/s; p < 0.0001, 9.7 ± 4.4 mm Hg vs. 8.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg; p < 0.0001 and 1.78 ± 0.51 cm2 vs. 1.85 ± 0.58 cm2; p = 0.03, respectively). This improvement of all parameters continued after one year follow up.

At discharge, 36 patients of this series presented moderate to severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and 30 of them (83%) improved at least one grade (from severe to moderate) after one year.

Conclusion
After one year follow up, there was significant improvement of hemodynamic parameters and regression of paravalvular regurgitation, compared to observations right after discharge.
These changed may be associated to the valve continuous expansion and remodeling, because of the nitinol frame.

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...