Primary PCI with Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Original Title: One-year Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Outcomes after Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Prague-19 Study. Reference: Widimsky P et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec;8(12).

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Primary PCI is the most common course of treatment for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but the role of bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) in this context remains unclear.

This prospective study included 70 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with BVS. Three patients could not receive BVS and got a bare metal stent instead.

At 30 days, there was definite thrombosis of BVS in a patient that had stopped DAPT and one death for a mechanical complication of infarction. At one year, there was one case of restenosis and a sudden death.

After 1 year, computed tomographic angiography performed in 59 patients showed binary restenosis rate of 2% and minimal luminal diameter of 3.0±0.6 mm.

Conclusion
The use of bioresorbable scaffold in the context of STEMI is feasible and safe, and offers excellent clinical and angiographic evolution at one year.

Editorial Comment
This study shows that the use of these new devices is favorable in complex scenarios such as PCI, with the advantage of recovering vessel physiology in time. At present, BVS present certain limitations, such as the limited choice of size, apart from the need of vessel preparation before implantation.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Cardiólogo Intervencionista
Fundación Favaloro – Buenos Aires

More articles by this author

AHA 2024 | SUMMIT

It has been previously shown that the pharmacological treatment of obesity (semaglutide) can reduce cardiovascular events in patients with cardiac failure (CF) and preserved...

AHA 2024 – BPROAD

Hypertension (elevated blood pressure, BP) is the most common comorbidity among diabetic patients and has been associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though as a...

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Long Term Results of the International Chimney Registry

The International Chimney Registry was an observational study aimed at assessing the use of chimney stenting during TAVR either to predict or treat coronary...

CANNULATE TAVR extended study: Impact of Commissural and Coronary Alignment in Coronary Cannulation Following TAVR with Evolut Fx

The new valve Evolut FX has shown better commissural alignment vs. its predecessor Evolut Pro+. Prior studies have already shown commissure alignment facilitates post...

TRISCEND II: Transcatheter Replacement vs. Medical Treatment for Tricuspid Regurgitation

The EVOQUE device is designed with an intra-annular sealing system that provides excellent anatomical compatibility and an adaptable shape. It is currently available in...