Primary PCI with Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Original Title: One-year Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Outcomes after Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Prague-19 Study. Reference: Widimsky P et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec;8(12).

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Primary PCI is the most common course of treatment for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but the role of bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) in this context remains unclear.

This prospective study included 70 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with BVS. Three patients could not receive BVS and got a bare metal stent instead.

At 30 days, there was definite thrombosis of BVS in a patient that had stopped DAPT and one death for a mechanical complication of infarction. At one year, there was one case of restenosis and a sudden death.

After 1 year, computed tomographic angiography performed in 59 patients showed binary restenosis rate of 2% and minimal luminal diameter of 3.0±0.6 mm.

Conclusion
The use of bioresorbable scaffold in the context of STEMI is feasible and safe, and offers excellent clinical and angiographic evolution at one year.

Editorial Comment
This study shows that the use of these new devices is favorable in complex scenarios such as PCI, with the advantage of recovering vessel physiology in time. At present, BVS present certain limitations, such as the limited choice of size, apart from the need of vessel preparation before implantation.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Cardiólogo Intervencionista
Fundación Favaloro – Buenos Aires

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...