Primary PCI with Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds

Original Title: One-year Clinical and Computed Tomography Angiographic Outcomes after Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Implantation during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. The Prague-19 Study. Reference: Widimsky P et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec;8(12).

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Primary PCI is the most common course of treatment for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but the role of bioresorbable scaffolds (BVS) in this context remains unclear.

This prospective study included 70 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with BVS. Three patients could not receive BVS and got a bare metal stent instead.

At 30 days, there was definite thrombosis of BVS in a patient that had stopped DAPT and one death for a mechanical complication of infarction. At one year, there was one case of restenosis and a sudden death.

After 1 year, computed tomographic angiography performed in 59 patients showed binary restenosis rate of 2% and minimal luminal diameter of 3.0±0.6 mm.

Conclusion
The use of bioresorbable scaffold in the context of STEMI is feasible and safe, and offers excellent clinical and angiographic evolution at one year.

Editorial Comment
This study shows that the use of these new devices is favorable in complex scenarios such as PCI, with the advantage of recovering vessel physiology in time. At present, BVS present certain limitations, such as the limited choice of size, apart from the need of vessel preparation before implantation.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.
Cardiólogo Intervencionista
Fundación Favaloro – Buenos Aires

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...