HOPE 3: Reducing LDL Improves Prognosis in Intermediate Risk Patients

In a large cohort of intermediate risk patients with no known CAD, treatment with low doses of statins in addition to an angiotensin receptor blocker and a diuretic, reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, compared to placebo.

These are the main findings of the HOPE 3 trial (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation) that randomized 12705 patients, and was presented at the scientific sessions of the American College of Cardiology 2016, and simultaneously published in NEJM.

The study formally tested the concept of“polypill” and its potential effects on hard cardiovascular events.

Patients were randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design, showing that the combination ofrosuvastatin 10 mg, candesartan 16 mg, and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg per day, results in a complete reduction of the1.4% risk, compared to placebo, in a median follow up period of 5.6 years.

The benefit of this treatment was largely associated with a reduction of LDL levels. When analyzed separately, the use of rosuvastatin resulted in an approximately 25% reduction, compared to placebo, while candesartan and hydrochlorothiazide had no significant impact.

The benefits of lowering blood pressure are obvious only in patients with higher systolic blood pressure. For hypertensives, the benefit is a 40% reduction in events rate, where half the benefit is due to statins and the other half due to antihypertensives.

In patients with systolic blood pressure of 143.5 mmHg or lower, the benefit was derived exclusively from statins and even in those with systolic blood pressure of 131.5 mmHg or lower, antihypertensives could be prejudicial.

More articles by this author

PARTNER 2A: TAVI Not Inferior to Surgery in Intermediate Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) with the new generation balloon expandable valve is at least as good as surgery in intermediate risk patients with...

The SAPIEN 3 Valve Resulted Superior to Surgery in an Observational Study

The last generation of the balloon expandable valve resulted superior to surgery in intermediate riskpatients, in a registry analyzis. Patients treated with the SAPIEN...

CoreValve US Pivotal: at 3 Years, the Self-Expanding Valve Maintains Its Advantage vs. Surgery

At 3 year follow up, the CoreValve US Pivotal study on high risk elderly patients, the self-expanding valve showed a lasting benefit vs. surgery. These...

PARTNER 1 in +90 Year Old Patients: TAVI and the Age Paradox

A new analyzis of the PARTNER 1 trial showed that patients over 90 undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) show no increase in mortality...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...