Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Original Title: Ventricular Assist Device in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Reference: Deepak Acharya et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(16):1871-1880.

 

Patients undergoing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with acute cardiac failure or cardiogenic shock have a high mortality rate with the conventional treatment.

This study assessed the outcomes of patients with AMI receiving a durable ventricular assist device.

All patients in the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) receiving a ventricular assist device in the context of AMI were included and compared with those receiving similar devices in other clinical contexts (not AMI).

In all, 502 patients with AMI received an assist device, 443 left ventricular assist devices; 33 biventricular assist devices; and 26 total artificial hearts.

Population mean age was 58.3 years and more than 70% were men.

In the group receiving the device in the context of AMI there was a higher proportion of patients had pre-operative intra-aortic balloon pumps (57.6% vs. 25.3%; p < 0.01), intubation (58% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.01), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

On month after ventricular assist device implantation, 91.8% of AMI patients were alive and continued with the support, 7.2% died on the device and 1% had a heart transplant.

After one year, 52% were alive and still on the support device, 25.7% had a heart transplant, 1.6% recovered and had the device removed, and 20.7% died on the device.

After adjusting for clinical differences, the AMI group requiring the device presented a short term mortality rate similar to that of the non AMI group (HR: 0.89; p = 0.30) but later on the first group saw a lower rate (HR: 0.55; p = 0.02).

Conclusion
Patients receiving a permanent ventricular assist device in the context of AMI in cardiogenic shock have a similar outcome to that of patients with similar devices despite being more critically sick prior implantation. Ventricular assist device implantation is an effective therapy for patients with post MI acute heart failure or cardiogenic shock when standard therapy fails.

More articles by this author

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...

Experience with the intra-annular self-expanding Navitor valve: data from the STS/ACC TVT registry

The expansion of TAVI, with the introduction of new-generation devices, has prioritized not only periprocedural safety, but also the preservation of coronary access, more...