Post PCI FFR Reduces MACE

Original Title: Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes

Reference: Shiv K. Agarwal, et al. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention 2016;9:1022-31

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

FFR post PCIFractional flow reserve has shown benefits and it is considered the gold standard to assess intermediate lesions (Class IA), but its use post PCI has not been evaluated yet.

574 patients with 664 lesions were analyzed; 45% had a history of diabetes, 48% multivessel disease and 45% diffuse disease.

Previous obstruction degree by quantitative angiography was 73±15%, 96% with FFR ≤0.80 and 73% FFR ≤0.75, regardless adenosine administration technique.

After PCI with angiographically satisfactory results, 21% (143 lesions) presented a suboptimal FFR ≤0.80 (0.75±0.05). After a second intervention to this group (post balloon dilation, subsequent stent implantation, or IVUS or OCT lesion assessment) FFR increased to 0.87±0.06 (p<0.0001). 9% continued with suboptimal FFR.

This was associated to longer procedural and fluoroscopy time, but not with more contrast.

Follow up was at 31 months with 19% of patients presenting some event (62 death by any cause, 12 MI, and 60 revascularizations).

MACE predictors were ACS, diffuse lesions and ≤0.86 final FFR.

In ROC curve analyzis, final FFR cutoff value predictor of MACE was ≤0.86 (23% vs. 17% p=0.02), for death ≤0.87 (13.5% vs. 9% p=0.03) and TVR ≤0.85 (12% vs. 8% p=0.03).

Conclusion

Post PCI FFR reclassifies 20% of PCI with satisfactory results, requiring more intervention to achieve complete functional revascularization at the time of index procedure. Post PCI FFR is an independent predictor of long term evolution.

Editorial Comment

This analyzis shows the concept of PCI “Functional Optimization”, because 20% of patients present ischemia after a satisfactory angiography.

Ideally, we should identify the groups that could benefit from this strategy in order not to unnecessarily prolong procedures and to save costs.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or any ideas here below.

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...