Post PCI FFR Reduces MACE

Original Title: Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes

Reference: Shiv K. Agarwal, et al. JACC Cardiovascular Intervention 2016;9:1022-31

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

FFR post PCIFractional flow reserve has shown benefits and it is considered the gold standard to assess intermediate lesions (Class IA), but its use post PCI has not been evaluated yet.

574 patients with 664 lesions were analyzed; 45% had a history of diabetes, 48% multivessel disease and 45% diffuse disease.

Previous obstruction degree by quantitative angiography was 73±15%, 96% with FFR ≤0.80 and 73% FFR ≤0.75, regardless adenosine administration technique.

After PCI with angiographically satisfactory results, 21% (143 lesions) presented a suboptimal FFR ≤0.80 (0.75±0.05). After a second intervention to this group (post balloon dilation, subsequent stent implantation, or IVUS or OCT lesion assessment) FFR increased to 0.87±0.06 (p<0.0001). 9% continued with suboptimal FFR.

This was associated to longer procedural and fluoroscopy time, but not with more contrast.

Follow up was at 31 months with 19% of patients presenting some event (62 death by any cause, 12 MI, and 60 revascularizations).

MACE predictors were ACS, diffuse lesions and ≤0.86 final FFR.

In ROC curve analyzis, final FFR cutoff value predictor of MACE was ≤0.86 (23% vs. 17% p=0.02), for death ≤0.87 (13.5% vs. 9% p=0.03) and TVR ≤0.85 (12% vs. 8% p=0.03).

Conclusion

Post PCI FFR reclassifies 20% of PCI with satisfactory results, requiring more intervention to achieve complete functional revascularization at the time of index procedure. Post PCI FFR is an independent predictor of long term evolution.

Editorial Comment

This analyzis shows the concept of PCI “Functional Optimization”, because 20% of patients present ischemia after a satisfactory angiography.

Ideally, we should identify the groups that could benefit from this strategy in order not to unnecessarily prolong procedures and to save costs.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or any ideas here below.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....