All-Spectrum Transradial Approach: Safer than Femoral

Original Title: Radial vs femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Reference: Ferrante G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2016; Epub ahead of print.

 

acceso_radial_finalRegardless the type of coronary syndrome, the transradial approach results in lower mortality and complications compared to the femoral.

Some studies (especially on chronic and stable patients) have seen contradicting results as regards the advantages of the transradial approach over the femoral, which is why this meta-analyzis of 24 studies was carried out, involving over 22,843 patients with PCI in the context of ACS

  • without ST elevation
  • with ST elevation
  • in stable patients

The transradial approach showed lower risk of all cause death (OR 0.71, CI 95% 0.58 to 0.87) and lower risk of combined cardiovascular events (OR 0.84; CI 95% 0.75 to 0.94) in the general population.

The transradial approach was also associated to lower major bleeding rate (OR 0.53; CI 95% 0.42 to 0.65) and lower major vascular complications rate (OR 0.23; CI 95% 0.16 to 0.34).

Other important data resulting from this work is that MI and stroke rates resulted similar for both vascular access sites.

When analyzing outcomes according to clinical presentation, stable patients are those who benefit most from reduced major bleeding. In the group of ACS patients, ST elevation MI patients saw the greatest benefit with transradial approach.

Lastly, the experienced centers obtained the highest benefits vs. femoral approach.

 

Conclusion

The transradial approach reduces mortality and combined events, and improves safety because of reduced bleeding and vascular complications, compared to the femoral access.

 

Editorial Comment

The benefit of the transradial approach seems out of question; however, a great randomized study would be useful to understand the mechanisms behind this advantage. Reduced major bleeding seems to be the main reason behind mortality decrease, though it may not be enough: there may be other, hidden mechanisms involved.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or any ideas here below.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...