Aortic Angulation: Impact on the Success of TAVR

Original Title: Aortic Angulation Attenuates Procedural Success Following Self-Expandable But Not Balloon-Expandable TAVR.

Reference: Abramowitz Y  et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print].

 

Impact of Post TAVR Aortic Angulation

The angulation degree between aorta and heart can make precise valve implantation challenging, especially extreme angulation, such as a horizontal aortic root.

As obvious as it may seem, there is limited data on the impact of aortic angulation in TAVR.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of aortic angulation immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

The study included 582 patients undergoing TAVR that had prior procedure CT scans available for aortic angulation evaluation.

End points were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.

Mean aortic angulation was 47.3 ± 8.7°, and patients were divided in two groups: <48° or ≥48° angulation.

In 480 patients receiving balloon expandable valves, the aorta did not influence acute periprocedural success or short term clinical outcomes.

On the contrary, in 102 patients receiving self-expandable valves, increased aortic angulation attenuated acute periprocedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; CI 95% 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008).

The numerical cutoff for aortic angulation with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was in fact ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%).

Patients with ≥48 angulation receiving self-expandable valves often needed a second valve and post dilation, had longer fluoroscopy time and increased device embolization and mild or greater than mild paravalvular regurgitation.

Mortality at 30 days was not influenced by device angulation.

 

Conclusion

Increased aortic root angulation can have a negative impact in acute periprocedural success in patients receiving self-expandable aortic valves but no in patients receiving balloon expandable valves.

 

Editorial Comment

Future studies with new devices should include aortic angulation as a factor to assess. New self-expandable repositionable and retrievable valves could solve this problem: during release (when presenting valve waist at annulus level) it is possible to push the whole system so that it “copies” the angulation between aorta and heart and to complete a practically horizontal release.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...