Aortic Angulation: Impact on the Success of TAVR

Original Title: Aortic Angulation Attenuates Procedural Success Following Self-Expandable But Not Balloon-Expandable TAVR.

Reference: Abramowitz Y  et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print].

 

Impact of Post TAVR Aortic Angulation

The angulation degree between aorta and heart can make precise valve implantation challenging, especially extreme angulation, such as a horizontal aortic root.

As obvious as it may seem, there is limited data on the impact of aortic angulation in TAVR.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of aortic angulation immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

The study included 582 patients undergoing TAVR that had prior procedure CT scans available for aortic angulation evaluation.

End points were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.

Mean aortic angulation was 47.3 ± 8.7°, and patients were divided in two groups: <48° or ≥48° angulation.

In 480 patients receiving balloon expandable valves, the aorta did not influence acute periprocedural success or short term clinical outcomes.

On the contrary, in 102 patients receiving self-expandable valves, increased aortic angulation attenuated acute periprocedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; CI 95% 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008).

The numerical cutoff for aortic angulation with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was in fact ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%).

Patients with ≥48 angulation receiving self-expandable valves often needed a second valve and post dilation, had longer fluoroscopy time and increased device embolization and mild or greater than mild paravalvular regurgitation.

Mortality at 30 days was not influenced by device angulation.

 

Conclusion

Increased aortic root angulation can have a negative impact in acute periprocedural success in patients receiving self-expandable aortic valves but no in patients receiving balloon expandable valves.

 

Editorial Comment

Future studies with new devices should include aortic angulation as a factor to assess. New self-expandable repositionable and retrievable valves could solve this problem: during release (when presenting valve waist at annulus level) it is possible to push the whole system so that it “copies” the angulation between aorta and heart and to complete a practically horizontal release.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

One-Year Results of ENCIRCLE: Percutaneous Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients Ineligible for Surgery or TEER

Symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients who are not candidates for surgery or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) remains a highly complex clinical scenario associated...

Can Coronary CT Angiography Replace Invasive Coronary Angiography in Pre-TAVI Coronary Assessment?

Coronary artery disease coexists in approximately half of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, making coronary assessment prior to the procedure essential. Invasive coronary...

Valve-in-Valve in Small Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding? Three-Year Results from the LYTEN Trial

Dysfunction of small surgical aortic bioprostheses represents a challenging scenario for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the valve-in-valve setting, due to the higher incidence...