Peri-Procedural MI Reduction: Cangrelor or Clopidogrel?

cangrelor vs. clopidogrelCangrelor is an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor approved to reduce peri-procedural ischemic events in patients undergoing PCI that have not previously received any other P2Y12 inhibitor.

 

The CHAMPION PHOENIX trial randomized a total of 11,145 patients to cangrelor vs. clopidogrel.

 

The study sought to explore the effect of cangrelor on peri-procedural acute myocardial infarction (AMI) according to different definitions.

 

462 patients (4.2%) undergoing PCI presented acute MI according to the 2nd universal definition. The vast majority of these infarctions were type 4A (n=433, 93.7%).

 

Treatment with cangrelor reduced MI incidence at 48 hrs. (3.8% vs. 4.7%; OR 0.80; CI 95%, 0.67-0.97; p=0.02).

 

When the SCAI definition of peri-procedural MI was applied, there were fewer MI (n=134). In addition, the effect of cangrelor remained significant (OR, 0.65; CI 95%, 0.46-0.92; p=0.01).

 

A similar effect of cangrelor was observed when MI was defined as peak CK-MB≥ 10x ULN (OR, 0.64; CI 95%I, 0.45-0.91) or when MI was defined with this same enzyme elevation but associated to ECG changes or ischemic symptoms (OR, 0.63; CI 95%, 0.48-0.84).

 

Any of the above definitions of MI were associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days.

 

Cangrelor administration reduced:

  • The composite death point of death.
  • MI (SCAI definition).
  • Ischemia driven target lesion revascularization or definite stent thrombosis (1.4% vs 2.1%; OR 0.69; 95% 0.51-0.92).

 

Conclusion

Peri-procedural MI in patients undergoing PCI continues to be associated to increased death risk, regardless MI definition. Cangrelor, compared to clopidogrel, significantly reduces MI rate.

 

Original Title: Consistent Reduction in Peri-Procedural Myocardial Infarction with Cangrelor as Assessed by Multiple Definitions: Findings from CHAMPION PHOENIX. Cangrelor Reduces MI in Patients Undergoing PCI.

Reference: Cavender et al. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.020829.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Diabetic Patients with AMI: De-Escalation Strategy

Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) of increasing prevalence over the last decade, associated with...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...