A New Indicator to Assess Stenosis Severity

Fractional Myocardial Mass to Assess Stenosis Severity

This study looked at the role of fractional myocardial mass (vessel-specific myocardial mass) in the assessment of stenosis physiological severity.

 

Researchers used CT angiography to study this new concept of myocardial mass subtended by a specific vessel, which could reduce anatomical-physiological mismatch.

 

The study included 463 patients with 724 lesions evaluated by multislice coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve measurement (FFR).

 

Fractional myocardial mass was assessed based on arterial tree length and myocardial mass by CT.

 

FFR <0.80 was considered a functionally significant lesion and it was found in 39% of observed vessels. Fractional myocardial mass decreased consistently according to vessel caliber, which is obvious.

 

FFR <0.80 increased in direct proportion to fractional myocardial mass and inversely to angiographic minimal luminal diameter (p < 0.001).

 

Fractional myocardial mass and minimal luminal diameter showed good correlation with FFR (r=0.61) and resulted superior to stenosis diameter to predict FFR <0.80.

 

Optimal cutoff value for fractional myocardial mass/minimal luminal diameter was 29 g/mm with 75% sensitivity,   77% specificity and 77% diagnostic accuracy.

 

This relation could add information to the classical stenosis diameter to predict FFR<0.80.

 

 

Conclusion

The relation fractional myocardial mass / minimal luminal diameter could help discriminate functional compromise of vessels more accurately than anatomical stenosis. The concept of fractional myocardial mass could explain the discrepancy between anatomy and physiology.

 

Original Title: Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery.

Reference: Hyung Yoon Kim et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1548-60.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...