A New Indicator to Assess Stenosis Severity

Fractional Myocardial Mass to Assess Stenosis Severity

This study looked at the role of fractional myocardial mass (vessel-specific myocardial mass) in the assessment of stenosis physiological severity.

 

Researchers used CT angiography to study this new concept of myocardial mass subtended by a specific vessel, which could reduce anatomical-physiological mismatch.

 

The study included 463 patients with 724 lesions evaluated by multislice coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve measurement (FFR).

 

Fractional myocardial mass was assessed based on arterial tree length and myocardial mass by CT.

 

FFR <0.80 was considered a functionally significant lesion and it was found in 39% of observed vessels. Fractional myocardial mass decreased consistently according to vessel caliber, which is obvious.

 

FFR <0.80 increased in direct proportion to fractional myocardial mass and inversely to angiographic minimal luminal diameter (p < 0.001).

 

Fractional myocardial mass and minimal luminal diameter showed good correlation with FFR (r=0.61) and resulted superior to stenosis diameter to predict FFR <0.80.

 

Optimal cutoff value for fractional myocardial mass/minimal luminal diameter was 29 g/mm with 75% sensitivity,   77% specificity and 77% diagnostic accuracy.

 

This relation could add information to the classical stenosis diameter to predict FFR<0.80.

 

 

Conclusion

The relation fractional myocardial mass / minimal luminal diameter could help discriminate functional compromise of vessels more accurately than anatomical stenosis. The concept of fractional myocardial mass could explain the discrepancy between anatomy and physiology.

 

Original Title: Physiological Severity of Coronary Artery Stenosis Depends on the Amount of Myocardial Mass Subtended by the Coronary Artery.

Reference: Hyung Yoon Kim et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 8;9(15):1548-60.

 

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...