TAVI Frailty Indices: We Should Start Using Them

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

TAVI Frailty IndicesFrailty should be taken into account when deciding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Even though several scales of frailty are available, they are yet to be tested in this group, with this strategy.

 

The study analyzed 101 patients, frailty was assessed clinically according to the following tests:

  • Katz index of Independence of Activity in Daily Living (KI of ADL),
  • Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS),
  • Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA),
  • 5-meters walking test (5MWT),
  • Hand Grip,
  • Identification Senior at Risk.

 

Population mean age was 81, 61 patients were women, most were symptomatic and in functional class III/IV. Mean aortic area was 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) cm2 and mean gradient was 87 (71-108) mmHg. EuroSCORE I was 16.5% and STS score was 15.4%.

 

91.1% of procedures was performed under general anesthesia, and the transfemoral was the most used approach (77.2%), followed by the transapical (20.8%) and the aortic (2%).

 

At one year, all-cause mortality was 17.8%. According to 5MWT, 17.8% were frail, CSHA scale 16.9%, Katz Index 17.8%, Hand Grip 6.9% and ISAR 52.5%. Frailty indices were strongly associated to all-cause mortality at one year.

 

Adjusted analysis confirmed the association between the different indices of frailty and all-cause mortality at one year. Small changes in the 5MWT (1 second increase), EMS (one point reduction) and one CSHA increase (one point) resulted in a three-fold mortality increase.

 

Conclusion

This study confirms most frailty indices have a strong capacity to predict mortality at 12 months. In TAVI candidates, the use of frailty indices such as the 5MWT, EMS, and the Hand Grip test, yield good results.

 

Editorial Comment

Frailty is increasingly being evaluated in TAVI candidates. This analysis shows that, even though there is no specific test to assess frailty, the combination of them provides significant information on high risk groups, however difficult it may be to leave out a patient based on this assessment. We still require further information, we should continue to research to find out which one group will not benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Impact of frailty on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Reference: Pawel Kleczynski, et al. Am Heart J 2017;185:52-8.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

Prospective Analysis of the Feasibility of the PASCAL System for Transcatheter Mitral Repair: OneForAll Registry

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is an effective option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation who are at high...

Left Bundle Branch Block after TAVR: What Is Its Impact?

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which can be either...

Multicenter Experience with 3D Intracardiac Echocardiography for Guiding Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. Imaging techniques play a fundamental role in interventional cardiac procedures. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) appears as an alternative to transesophageal...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...