TAVI Frailty Indices: We Should Start Using Them

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

TAVI Frailty IndicesFrailty should be taken into account when deciding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Even though several scales of frailty are available, they are yet to be tested in this group, with this strategy.

 

The study analyzed 101 patients, frailty was assessed clinically according to the following tests:

  • Katz index of Independence of Activity in Daily Living (KI of ADL),
  • Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS),
  • Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA),
  • 5-meters walking test (5MWT),
  • Hand Grip,
  • Identification Senior at Risk.

 

Population mean age was 81, 61 patients were women, most were symptomatic and in functional class III/IV. Mean aortic area was 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) cm2 and mean gradient was 87 (71-108) mmHg. EuroSCORE I was 16.5% and STS score was 15.4%.

 

91.1% of procedures was performed under general anesthesia, and the transfemoral was the most used approach (77.2%), followed by the transapical (20.8%) and the aortic (2%).

 

At one year, all-cause mortality was 17.8%. According to 5MWT, 17.8% were frail, CSHA scale 16.9%, Katz Index 17.8%, Hand Grip 6.9% and ISAR 52.5%. Frailty indices were strongly associated to all-cause mortality at one year.

 

Adjusted analysis confirmed the association between the different indices of frailty and all-cause mortality at one year. Small changes in the 5MWT (1 second increase), EMS (one point reduction) and one CSHA increase (one point) resulted in a three-fold mortality increase.

 

Conclusion

This study confirms most frailty indices have a strong capacity to predict mortality at 12 months. In TAVI candidates, the use of frailty indices such as the 5MWT, EMS, and the Hand Grip test, yield good results.

 

Editorial Comment

Frailty is increasingly being evaluated in TAVI candidates. This analysis shows that, even though there is no specific test to assess frailty, the combination of them provides significant information on high risk groups, however difficult it may be to leave out a patient based on this assessment. We still require further information, we should continue to research to find out which one group will not benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Impact of frailty on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Reference: Pawel Kleczynski, et al. Am Heart J 2017;185:52-8.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Drugs for the Treatment of No-Reflow During PCI

The no-reflow phenomenon is one of the most frustrating complications of primary angioplasty (pPCI), reflecting persistent microvascular damage that, in the mid- to long-term,...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Rotational atherectomy and its technical secrets: use of floppy or ES guidewire

Rotational atherectomy (RA) remains a very useful tool in the management of severe coronary calcification. However, many of its technical aspects rely more on...