DESSOLVE III: Xience vs. MiStent

DESSOLVE III: Xience vs. MiStentThe MiStent device is made of cobalt-chromium, with struts of up to 64 µm thick. It is coated with a completely absorbable polymer that contains a microcrystalline form of sirolimus that embeds directly into the vessel wall. The drug is eluted continuously for up to 9 months.

 

This was a multicenter noninferiority study that randomized patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive Xience or MiStent devices. It enrolled a total 1398 patients; about 59% of them were admitted while presenting acute coronary syndrome.

 

At 1 year, the primary endpoint was present in 6.5% of patients in the Xience groups vs. 5.8% of patients in the MiStent group, thus achieving noninferiority (p < 0.001). There were no differences as regards cardiac death (Xience 1.6% vs. MiStent 2.0%; p = 0.552), target-vessel infarction (1.9% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.716), clinically justified target-vessel revascularization (3.8% vs. 2.6%; p = 0.222) or definite thrombosis (0.7% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.480).

                                                         

Conclusion

In a 12-month follow-up, the MiStent device with early polymer absorption and sirolimus sustained release was noninferior to everolimus-eluting stent with permanent polymer Xience.

 

Dr. Robbert J. De Winter
Dr. Robbert J. De Winter

Original title: DESSOLVE III: A Randomised Comparison of Xience vs. MiStent, a Novel DES that Embeds Sirolimus Microcrystals in the Vessel Wall.

Presenter: Robbert J. de Winter.

 

 

DeWinterRobbertJ


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...