TCT 2017 | INTREPID: Mitral Replacement with a Self-Expanding Device

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

Intrepid is a 43-, 46-, and 50-mm nitinol self-expanding valve with bovine pericardial leaflets that is placed using a transapical delivery system with a 35-Fr access.

TCT 2017 | INTREPID: reemplazo mitral con prótesis autoexpandible

This pilot study enrolled 50 patients with severe mitral regurgitation who were symptomatic and at a high surgical risk, or in whom surgery was contraindicated.


Read also: TCT 2017 | MAVERIC: Results 6 Months After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement”.


The rate of implantation success was 98%; the rate of 30-day mortality was 14% and 1-year survival was 77%. In patients who survived 1 year, there was no device dysfunction, hemolysis, thrombosis, or residual mitral regurgitation. After a 1-year follow-up, 79% of all survivors presented a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I-II.

 

Conclusion

Treatment with the Intrepid device was feasible and able to correct mitral regurgitation in patients at high or extreme surgical risk.

 

Courtesy of the SBHCI.

 

Original title: 30-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter MV Replacement in Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation.

Presenter: Paul Sorajja.

 

 

INTREPID


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...