Post EVAR Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Based Follow Up Reduces CT by 90%. Is It Safe Though?

This four-year retrospective analyzis has shown that contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post endovascular aortic repair is safe and effective. Aneurysm related mortality, reintervention rate, sac retraction and endoleak detection resulted similar to that of CT based follow up protocols.

El tratamiento endovascular parece superior a la cirugía en aneurismas rotosIn this study, doppler and enhanced contrast ultrasound were the main follow up techniques, leaving CT for undiagnosed cases, ambiguous images, or for planned reintervention cases. This protocol, used the last 4 years, reduced CT by 90%, thereby reducing radiation exposure.

 

This reference center based its follow up plan on doppler ultrasound, leaving CT scans for undiagnosed cases in the period between 1999 and 2011 (group A). Since 2012, contrast ultrasound was introduced for cases where conventional doppler ultrasound would detect endoleak, > 5mm sac growth within 6 months, or routinely for patients with kidney failure or contrast allergies.


Read also: Risk of Colonic Ischemia after Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.


The study included a total 880 patients (mean age: 75.6± 8.4 years; 824 male) undergoing EVAR between 1999 and 2015 with at least one year follow up (mean 48 months).

 

During this period, 318 contrast enhanced ultrasound were performed with no associated complications.

 

Indication for contrast enhanced ultrasound were endoleak (50% of cases), sac expansion (11%), kidney failure level 3 or higher (29%) and iodine contrast allergies (10%).


Read also: Maintaining Physical Activity After an Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Mortality.


Contrast enhanced ultrasound was compared against CT and additional confirmation by angiography or operative findings in the first 100 patients.

 

Contrast enhanced ultrasound showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when classifying endoleaks.

 

There were no differences in events between the different groups of patients and CT use was reduced by 90%.

 

Conclusion

The introduction of contrast enhanced ultrasound based follow up protocol post EVAR resulted as safe and effective for endoleak detection as the CT based protocols published so far. This allowed a 90% reduction in CT use, with the resulting reduction in iodine radiation exposure.  

 

Original title: Endovascular Aortic Repair Follow up Protocol Based on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Is Safe and Effective.

Reference: Emiliano Chisci et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2018). Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: Treatment Outcomes According to a Worldwide Registry

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a highly limiting condition that, despite its moderate incidence, significantly impacts patient prognosis and quality of life. The...

Contemporary Outcomes of Acute Limb Ischemia Endovascular Revascularization

Acute limb ischemia (ALI) is a vascular emergency with high mortality rate. It has been defined as a sudden occlusion of limb perfusion compromising...

TCT 2024 | SIRONA: Randomized Study Comparing Sirolimus-Coated vs Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Disease

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, investigator-initiated non-inferiority study compared the use of sirolimus-coated balloon (MagicTouch) vs paclitaxel-coated balloon in endovascular treatment.  The primary objective was to...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...