Cardiovascular Events During World Cup Soccer, an Old Article Worth Remembering

Is it possible for a soccer match to trigger an infarction? Is it possible for the stress derived from watching our national team play to trigger a cardiovascular event? Many might think that these are exaggerations. However, not only is it possible, but it has been proved beyond the shadow of a doubt for some time now. And the ideal time to answer these questions definitively is during a FIFA World Cup.

We often use these sections to comment on the latest articles published, but the soccer World Cup never goes unnoticed (particularly in Latin America). That is the reason why we bring back this article published in NEJM almost 10 years ago.

 

The 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany provided an opportunity to examine the relation between emotional stress and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular events in Munich during the World Cup were prospectively assessed alongside events that occurred in the same months of different years (as control periods).

 

During the World Cup, there were 4279 acute cardiovascular events, many more than during control periods.


Lea también: FFR vs Angiography Guided CABG.


On days of matches involving the German team, the incidence of cardiac emergencies almost tripled the incidence during the control period (2.66 times more; 2.33 to 3.04; p = 0.0001). However, if we take into account men only, the incidence was more than three-fold (3.26 times; p < 0.001). Women were able to enjoy the games a little calmer, although their risk of events almost doubled the risk observed during the control period (1.82 times).

 

The proportion of patients with known coronary heart disease was 47%, as compared with 29.1% of patients with events during the control period.

 

The highest incidence of events was observed during the 2 hours after the beginning of each match involving the German team.


Lea también: First Results for Ticagrelor in Elective Coronary Angioplasty.


The incidence of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation during the World Cup increased 2.49 times, of myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation or unstable angina increased 2.61 times, and of life-threatening arrhythmia increased 3.07 times compared with the control period (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

 

We should take into account that this study was carried out in a population often considered less “hot-tempered” than the overall Latin American population. What was the incidence of infarction in Brazil in 2014 during the semifinal match? And what about in Argentina, in 2018, upon seeing their best player miss a penalty? We probably will never have the exact figures, but we can be certain that there were many more events than in any other time point.

 

Conclusion

Viewing a stressful soccer match during the World Cup at least doubles the risk of a cardiovascular event. In view of these results, preventive measures should be taken, particularly for men with known coronary heart disease.

 

Original title: Cardiovascular Events During World Cup Soccer.

Reference: Ute Wilbert-Lampen et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:475-83.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...