Cardiovascular Events During World Cup Soccer, an Old Article Worth Remembering

Is it possible for a soccer match to trigger an infarction? Is it possible for the stress derived from watching our national team play to trigger a cardiovascular event? Many might think that these are exaggerations. However, not only is it possible, but it has been proved beyond the shadow of a doubt for some time now. And the ideal time to answer these questions definitively is during a FIFA World Cup.

We often use these sections to comment on the latest articles published, but the soccer World Cup never goes unnoticed (particularly in Latin America). That is the reason why we bring back this article published in NEJM almost 10 years ago.

 

The 2006 FIFA World Cup Germany provided an opportunity to examine the relation between emotional stress and the incidence of cardiovascular events. Cardiovascular events in Munich during the World Cup were prospectively assessed alongside events that occurred in the same months of different years (as control periods).

 

During the World Cup, there were 4279 acute cardiovascular events, many more than during control periods.


Lea también: FFR vs Angiography Guided CABG.


On days of matches involving the German team, the incidence of cardiac emergencies almost tripled the incidence during the control period (2.66 times more; 2.33 to 3.04; p = 0.0001). However, if we take into account men only, the incidence was more than three-fold (3.26 times; p < 0.001). Women were able to enjoy the games a little calmer, although their risk of events almost doubled the risk observed during the control period (1.82 times).

 

The proportion of patients with known coronary heart disease was 47%, as compared with 29.1% of patients with events during the control period.

 

The highest incidence of events was observed during the 2 hours after the beginning of each match involving the German team.


Lea también: First Results for Ticagrelor in Elective Coronary Angioplasty.


The incidence of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation during the World Cup increased 2.49 times, of myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation or unstable angina increased 2.61 times, and of life-threatening arrhythmia increased 3.07 times compared with the control period (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons).

 

We should take into account that this study was carried out in a population often considered less “hot-tempered” than the overall Latin American population. What was the incidence of infarction in Brazil in 2014 during the semifinal match? And what about in Argentina, in 2018, upon seeing their best player miss a penalty? We probably will never have the exact figures, but we can be certain that there were many more events than in any other time point.

 

Conclusion

Viewing a stressful soccer match during the World Cup at least doubles the risk of a cardiovascular event. In view of these results, preventive measures should be taken, particularly for men with known coronary heart disease.

 

Original title: Cardiovascular Events During World Cup Soccer.

Reference: Ute Wilbert-Lampen et al. N Engl J Med 2008;358:475-83.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...