Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty at Very Long Term

With a mean follow up of 15 years, and some patients that survived over 20 years, this study shows that more than 75% of patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis show sustained results with balloon valvuloplasty. Predictors of this excellent long-term outcome are many, but they are determined mainly by age, prior symptoms and valve area obtained after procedure.  

valvuloplastía mitralOver the years, mitral valvuloplasty has remained the preferred treatment for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and suitable anatomy.

 

All consecutive patients undergoing balloon valvuloplasty between 1987 and 2010 were included. Primary end-point was a composite of all cause death, need for mitral surgery or repeat valvuloplasty at up to 23 years.


Read also: How to Predict Events in Order to Decide Whether to Revascularize Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.


In all, 1582 patients were included over the years and success was achieved in 90.9% of the population. I independent predictors of intraprocedural success were left atrial size (OR 0.96, p=0.045), Wilkins score ≤8 (OR 1.66, p=0.045), and age (OR 0.97, p=0.006).

Very long-term follow-up (mean follow up = 15.6 years) was obtained in 79.1% of the population, with 19.1% incidence of the primary end-point. Separately, mortality resulted as low as 0.6%, need for valve surgery, 8.3%, and repeat valvuloplasty, 10%.


Read also: More Evidence For MitraClip in High Risk Patients with Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation.


On multivariable analysis, functional class III-IV (HR 1.62, p<0.001), older age (HR 0.97, p=0.028 and post procedural mitral area ≤1.75 cm² (HR 1.67; p=0.028) were independent predictors of the primary end point.

 

Conclusion

Time goes by and mitral valvuloplasty remains the preferred treatment for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis and suitable anatomy, given its excellent results even after 20 years.

 

Original Title: Very Long Term Follow-Up After Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvuloplasty.

Reference: Rafael A. Meneguz-Moreno et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...

Cardiac Remodeling After Percutaneous ASD Closure: Should It Be Immediate or Progressive?

Atrial septal defect (ASD) is a common congenital heart disease that generates a left-to-right shunt, leading to right-side chamber overload and a risk of...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...