TCT 2018 | PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve: Clinical and Hemodynamic Results Maintained in the Long Term

The 1-year follow-up for this study was published last year in JACC, and it showed that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in failed bioprosthetic valves has low rates of complications, boosts significant hemodynamic improvement, and results in relatively low mortality. Now, the 3-year results are presented at TCT 2018.

TCT 2018 | PARTNER 2 Valve-in-Valve: se mantienen los resultados clínicos y hemodinámicos a largo plazoThe study followed 365 patients who underwent valve-in-valve treatment with a Sapien XT failed bioprosthetic valve of less than 21 mm, with ejection fraction less than 20%, and an estimated life expectancy of less than 2 years. The average age of patients was 79 years, the mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) predicted risk of mortality score was 9.1%, and more than 90% of patients had New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV symptoms.

 

Reported mortality at 1 year was 12.1% and at 3 years, 32.7%.

 

The majority of patients were treated with a 23-mm valve, thus generating a 1.2-cm2 mean valve area and a 17.7-mmHg mean gradient after the procedure. These results were maintained throughout 3 years.


Read also: TCT 2018 | TALENT: Ultrathin Struts and Bioresorbable Polymer at the Lowest Possible Cost.


At 3 years, 86% of patients had NYHA class I/II heart symptoms and sustained improvement in quality-of-life scores.

 

Original title: Late Follow-Up After Treatment of Failing Surgical Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves with a Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Presenter: John G. Webb.

 

PARTNER-Valve-in-Valve


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Secondary Access in TAVI: Is Transradial Approach our Best Bet?

In some countries, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Primary transfemoral access...

Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: A Complex Decision

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis continues to pose a significant challenge when it comes to clinical decision-making, often due to the difficulty in identifying symptoms....

TAVI and Aortic Regurgitation: Are All Valves the Same?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) accounts for 0.5- 2.2% of all cases of valve disease in individuals over 65 years old. According to current guidelines, surgery is...

1-Year Outcomes of US TAVR Registry with 5th Generation Balloon Expandable Valves

The use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has extended to younger patients with lower risk severe aortic stenosis (AS) and therefore the improvement...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Secondary Access in TAVI: Is Transradial Approach our Best Bet?

In some countries, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Primary transfemoral access...

FAVOR III Europa Sub-Analysis: Coronary Revascularization Deferral Based On QFR vs FFR

When it comes to intermediate coronary lesion revascularization decision making, functional assessment is the recommended. At present, several indices are used, such as fractional...

ROUTE TRAIL: DKCRUSH vs. DKRUSH Culotte in Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions

Coronary bifurcation lesions represent a frequent technical challenge, making between 15% and 20% of cases. Though provisional stenting is mostly used, complex bifurcations are...