Cautious Administration of Supplemental 02, Especially in Acute Stroke or MI

Recent studies show the potential damaging effect of supplemental oxygen in the context of acute stroke and myocardial infarction. Experts now say that it should not be used in patients with >92% oxygen saturation.

DETO2X-AMI: el O2 suplementario no aporta beneficios en pacientes con sospecha de infartoThese guidelines have looked into the most recent studies, including the DET02X-AMI, which suggest supplemental oxygen therapy could increase mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with normal oxygen saturation.

 

Until recently, oxygen administration was regarded as basic standard of care in acute patients; in fact, up to 25% of patients admitted to the ER receive oxygen. Clinicians prescribe oxygen to many stroke patients with no hypoxemia and to nearly all MI patients.


Read also: Safety of Combining New Anticoagulant Agents and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.


In 2017, following the DET02X-AMI, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines suggested lowering saturation limit from <95% to <90% in MI patients.

 

The American Heart Association (AHA) together with the Stroke Association, recommended maintaining saturation over 94% in patients with ischemic stroke. AHA guidelines for MI had not been updated since 2013, but they did recommend using oxygen only with <90% saturation, cardiac failure or dyspnea.  None of these guidelines inform on upper limits, or when supplemental oxygen should be stopped.

 

After looking at 25 studies and more than 16000 patients, the authors conclude there is enough evidence to recommend an upper limit of oxygen saturation no higher than 96%. This because values over 96% lead to a small increase in mortality rate with no apparent benefit.


Read also: Surprises in the Physiopathology of Critical Ischemia.


There is no doubt about how to proceed with MI or stroke patients with 90 and 92% saturation, and with saturation limits over 92% it is clear no supplemental oxygen should be provided.

 

Original title: Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline.

Reference: Siemieniuk RAC et al. BMJ. 2018; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...