Cautious Administration of Supplemental 02, Especially in Acute Stroke or MI

Recent studies show the potential damaging effect of supplemental oxygen in the context of acute stroke and myocardial infarction. Experts now say that it should not be used in patients with >92% oxygen saturation.

DETO2X-AMI: el O2 suplementario no aporta beneficios en pacientes con sospecha de infartoThese guidelines have looked into the most recent studies, including the DET02X-AMI, which suggest supplemental oxygen therapy could increase mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with normal oxygen saturation.

 

Until recently, oxygen administration was regarded as basic standard of care in acute patients; in fact, up to 25% of patients admitted to the ER receive oxygen. Clinicians prescribe oxygen to many stroke patients with no hypoxemia and to nearly all MI patients.


Read also: Safety of Combining New Anticoagulant Agents and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.


In 2017, following the DET02X-AMI, the European Society of Cardiology guidelines suggested lowering saturation limit from <95% to <90% in MI patients.

 

The American Heart Association (AHA) together with the Stroke Association, recommended maintaining saturation over 94% in patients with ischemic stroke. AHA guidelines for MI had not been updated since 2013, but they did recommend using oxygen only with <90% saturation, cardiac failure or dyspnea.  None of these guidelines inform on upper limits, or when supplemental oxygen should be stopped.

 

After looking at 25 studies and more than 16000 patients, the authors conclude there is enough evidence to recommend an upper limit of oxygen saturation no higher than 96%. This because values over 96% lead to a small increase in mortality rate with no apparent benefit.


Read also: Surprises in the Physiopathology of Critical Ischemia.


There is no doubt about how to proceed with MI or stroke patients with 90 and 92% saturation, and with saturation limits over 92% it is clear no supplemental oxygen should be provided.

 

Original title: Oxygen therapy for acutely ill medical patients: a clinical practice guideline.

Reference: Siemieniuk RAC et al. BMJ. 2018; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...

ACC 2025 | FLAVOUR II: Angiography-Derived FFR-Guided vs. IVUS-Guided PCI

Physiological assessment is effective when it comes to decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite the available evidence, its use remains limited. AngioFFR...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...