Do NOACs Result in Any Benefit in TAVR?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The need for anticoagulation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is over 15% according to different reports and, so far, no one has analyzed in depth whether new oral anticoagulant agents (non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants [NOACs]) result in superior benefit compared with classic vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

This study analyzed 962 patients. Among them, 326 received NOACs (33.9%) and 636 received VKAs (66.1%).

The primary endpoint at 12 months was a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.

Groups were similar: the mean age was 81 years, 52% of patients were women, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 4.5%, and the CHA2DS2 VASC Score ≥2, 95.2%. Balloon-expandable valves were the most used valves.


Read also: Must Post MI Patients Use B Blockers for Life?


At 30 days, there were no differences in mortality, major bleeding, or life-threatening bleeding, but NOAC patients had higher rates of non-disabling stroke compared with VKA patients (1.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001).

At 1 year, the primary endpoint was higher for NOAC patients (20.9% vs. 14.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 2.04; p 0 = 0.018); there were no differences as regards mortality, acute myocardial infarction, or bleeding. The rates of non-disabling stroke were higher for NOAC patients (1.6% vs. 0.3%; HR: 5.00; 95% CI: 0.97 to 25.81; p = 0.054).

Conclusion

Chronic use of NOACs and VKAs among patients in need of oral anticoagulation after TAVR resulted in comparable bleeding risk at 1 year. NOACs resulted in a higher ischemic event rate, something that should be evaluated in large randomized trials.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Original Title: Oral Anticoagulant Type and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: David Jochheim, et al. JACC cardiovasc Interven. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic. The...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC 2025 | WARRIOR: Ischemia in Women with Non-Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Approximately half of all women with symptomatic ischemia who undergo coronary angiography are found to have non-obstructive coronary artery disease ((ischemia and non-obstructive coronary...