Do NOACs Result in Any Benefit in TAVR?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

The need for anticoagulation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is over 15% according to different reports and, so far, no one has analyzed in depth whether new oral anticoagulant agents (non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants [NOACs]) result in superior benefit compared with classic vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

This study analyzed 962 patients. Among them, 326 received NOACs (33.9%) and 636 received VKAs (66.1%).

The primary endpoint at 12 months was a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.

Groups were similar: the mean age was 81 years, 52% of patients were women, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score was 4.5%, and the CHA2DS2 VASC Score ≥2, 95.2%. Balloon-expandable valves were the most used valves.


Read also: Must Post MI Patients Use B Blockers for Life?


At 30 days, there were no differences in mortality, major bleeding, or life-threatening bleeding, but NOAC patients had higher rates of non-disabling stroke compared with VKA patients (1.2% vs. 0%; p < 0.001).

At 1 year, the primary endpoint was higher for NOAC patients (20.9% vs. 14.4%; hazard ratio [HR] 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 2.04; p 0 = 0.018); there were no differences as regards mortality, acute myocardial infarction, or bleeding. The rates of non-disabling stroke were higher for NOAC patients (1.6% vs. 0.3%; HR: 5.00; 95% CI: 0.97 to 25.81; p = 0.054).

Conclusion

Chronic use of NOACs and VKAs among patients in need of oral anticoagulation after TAVR resulted in comparable bleeding risk at 1 year. NOACs resulted in a higher ischemic event rate, something that should be evaluated in large randomized trials.

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Original Title: Oral Anticoagulant Type and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: David Jochheim, et al. JACC cardiovasc Interven. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....