ESC 2019 | AFIRE: Monotherapy with Rivaroxaban in Atrial Fibrillation and Stable CAD

In patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease who have not had revascularization procedures in the last 12 months, monotherapy with rivaroxaban seems the best treatment strategy compared to rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet antiaggregation. This is what resulted from the AFIRE study, presented during the ESC 2019 in Paris and published in NEJM.

Monotherapy with rivaroxaban resulted non-inferior in terms of the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization and all-cause death at 2-year follow-up (4.14% vs 5.75% per patient/year; p<0.001 for non-inferiority).

We also saw significant lower risk of bleeding with the monotherapy, and even all-cause death saw a reduction (1.85% vs 3.37%), which involves reduced rate of both cardiac and non-cardiac deaths. This difference in safety in favor of the monotherapy with rivaroxaban was behind the early interruption of the study.

With this evidence, rivaroxaban with no antiaggregation seems the best strategy in known coronary patients that also present atrial fibrillation, as long as a year has passed since the last revascularization procedure.


Read also: ESC 2019 | MITRA-FR: 2-Year Outcomes of One of the Largest Studies on MitraClip.


One of the limitations of this study was the relatively low number of patients and the fact that it only included Asian (who are often smaller and therefore more prone to bleeding with the same dose).

The AFIRE randomized patients to rivaroxaban monotherapy (10 mg/day for those with creatinine clearance of 15 to 49 ml/min or 15 mg/day for patients with 50 ml/min or more) vs rivaroxaban plus simple antiaggregation according to physician criteria (70% received aspirin and the rest some P2Y12 inhibitor with clopidogrel mostly).

At mean follow-up of 24.1 months, rivaroxaban as monotherapy reached non-inferiority criterion. The monotherapy also resulted safer, with reduced net adverse events (3.90% vs 6.28%, composite of all-cause death, infarction, stroke and major bleeding).

Original title: Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation with stable coronary disease.

Reference: Yasuda S et al. N Engl J Med. 2019; Epub ahead of print.

afire-articulo-original

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...

STRIDE: Semaglutide in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease and Type II Diabetes

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a severe complication in patients with type II diabetes, primarily affecting peripheral vessels, especially below-the-knee (BTK) arteries. This condition...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

RACE Trial: Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty and Riociguat on Right Ventricular Afterload and Function in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Even though pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), up to 40% of patients are not candidates because...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...