ESC 2019 | SYNTAXES: Ten-Year Outcomes!

The SYNTAXES (SYNTAX Extended Survival) was presented at ESC 2019 with somewhat unexpected results in favor of PCI. This is why the SYNTAX continues to be one of the best studies interventional cardiologists can rely on.

The original SYNTAX tested mortality (primary end point) with PCI vs. CABG in patients with multivessel and/or left main disease. After the SYNTAX, several randomized studies have followed suit, using more modern stents, intravascular imaging and coronary physiology to decide for or against PCI.

There has been a debate about long-term outcomes, seeing as, in theory, CABG would have greater benefits. The SYNTAXES is the first large randomized study to provide us with unique ten- year outcomes for PCI (at least in terms of mortality). It is worth noting that a remarkable 94% of the population was able to complete follow up.


Read also: ESC 2019 | PARAGON-HF: Sacubitril/Valsartan Somewhat Disappointing, though a Few Would Benefit.


Results showed the equivalence in primary end point (all-cause mortality) between PCI and CABG (27% PCI and 23.5% CABG; p=0.092). There were no differences in patients with left main disease (26.1% PCI and 26.7% CABG; p=0.47) or diabetis (34.2% PCI and 32.1% CABG, p=0.56).

However, there was a difference in survival in favor of CABG in patients with three-vessel disease (27.7% PCI and 20.6% CABG, p=0.006). This difference was driven by patients with SYNTAX score >33. It does not come as a surprise and, for years now, we have known the SYNTAX >33 are not for interventional cardiologists, unless there is CABG counterindication.

These outcomes provide us with the foundation to further PCI, especially in the treatment of diabetics (despite the FREEDOM), and patients with left main disease and three-vessel disease with low or intermediate SYNTAX score.

All this in the context of a stent that has been discontinued and that has clearly been surpassed by the new generation devices (even though we seem to have reached a plateau). Furthermore, there are now more potent antiplatelet agents, coronary physiology to make better informed decisions and intravascular imaging to optimize outcomes.

Original title: Ten-year survival after coronary artery bypass grafting vs PCI: the SYNTAX Extended Survival study.

Reference: Presentado por Daniel Johannes en el ESC 2019. Paris, Francia.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...